75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental PureContact LS vs Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental PureContact LS if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Hi Trac 2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 48 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Hi Trac 2 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 82 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Hi Trac 2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Vredestein Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 83 |
| Dry | 86 | 80 |
| Wet | 79 | 86 |
| Snow | 48 | – |
| Comfort | 58 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 83 |
| Handling | 85 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental PureContact LS receives a polarized reception from users, balancing praise for its longevity and wet-weather performance against significant complaints regarding noise levels and cold-weather flat-spotting. While some drivers appreciate the tire's luxury-oriented ride and tread life, others report inconsistent quality and frustrating vibration issues that detract from the overall ownership experience.
Pros
- Extended tread life compared to performance-oriented alternatives
- Reliable grip and stability in wet road conditions
- Comfortable, vibration-isolating ride quality
- Improved handling characteristics over many original equipment tires
Cons
- Persistent flat-spotting issues, particularly in colder temperatures
- Excessive road noise and humming at highway speeds
- Diminished traction and grip performance as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent winter weather capability
Observations
- Owners of luxury sedans like the Lexus ES 350 and Lincoln Continental reported significant issues with morning flat-spotting and vibrations.
- Users transitioning from performance-focused tires, such as the ExtremeContact DWS 06, noted a distinct trade-off between increased tread life and a loss of sporty steering feedback.
The Vredestein Hi Trac 2 is generally regarded as a capable performer in wet weather conditions, offering reliable braking and traction. However, user experience is polarized by concerns regarding rapid tread wear and soft sidewall construction, which can impact handling stability during cornering.
Pros
- Strong wet weather grip and braking performance
- Quiet operation compared to factory-fitted alternatives
- Good traction for acceleration and braking
- Suitable for lightweight vehicle applications
Cons
- Poor tread longevity, with some users reporting significant wear under 10,000 miles
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'wobbly' sensation or excessive flex during cornering
- Lack of lateral grip in dry conditions
- Premium pricing point that some users feel is not justified by the wear rate
Observations
- Users with 65-profile tires noted significant sidewall bulge, requiring higher inflation pressures to improve handling stability.
- The tire is reported to perform well on lightweight sports cars, though it may struggle with weight transfer on heavier or more demanding vehicles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Vredestein Hi Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
83
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental PureContact LS if dry and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 82 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 83 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 86 vs 79 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PureContact LS scores 86 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Vredestein Hi Trac 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental PureContact LS also compared with
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.