83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama A539 if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Hi Trac 2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Hi Trac 2 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Hi Trac 2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 75 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Hi Trac 2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 82 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Hi Trac 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Hi Trac 2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Hi Trac 2 | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 85 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 79 |
| Dry | 80 | 81 |
| Wet | 86 | 75 |
| Comfort | 82 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 78 |
| Handling | 80 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Hi Trac 2 is generally regarded as a capable performer in wet weather conditions, offering reliable braking and traction. However, user experience is polarized by concerns regarding rapid tread wear and soft sidewall construction, which can impact handling stability during cornering.
Pros
- Strong wet weather grip and braking performance
- Quiet operation compared to factory-fitted alternatives
- Good traction for acceleration and braking
- Suitable for lightweight vehicle applications
Cons
- Poor tread longevity, with some users reporting significant wear under 10,000 miles
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'wobbly' sensation or excessive flex during cornering
- Lack of lateral grip in dry conditions
- Premium pricing point that some users feel is not justified by the wear rate
Observations
- Users with 65-profile tires noted significant sidewall bulge, requiring higher inflation pressures to improve handling stability.
- The tire is reported to perform well on lightweight sports cars, though it may struggle with weight transfer on heavier or more demanding vehicles.
The Yokohama A539 is widely regarded as a dependable, classic-style tire that excels in providing predictable handling and reliable braking for older or smaller-displacement vehicles. While it is highly praised by owners of classic Minis and vintage hatchbacks for its cornering feedback, it is generally considered a capable all-rounder rather than a high-performance track tire.
Pros
- Excellent cornering grip and handling feedback
- Highly predictable and dependable performance
- Strong braking capabilities in both wet and dry conditions
- Well-suited for classic vehicle fitments and smaller wheel diameters
Cons
- Can struggle with traction when cold
- Limited performance in aggressive, high-power driving scenarios
- Noticeable road noise when pushed to the limit
- Wet weather performance can be inconsistent depending on vehicle weight and power
Observations
- Highly favored for classic Mini applications, particularly in 13-inch sizes, where it is considered a top-tier choice.
- Users note that while the tire performs well on lightweight vintage cars, it may exhibit wheel spin on more powerful or torque-heavy setups.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2 | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Vredestein
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac 2 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama A539 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 86 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 scores 83 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama A539 scores 85 vs 80 on handling.
Tire A · Vredestein Hi Trac 2
Tire B · Yokohama A539
More comparisons
Also compared with
Vredestein Hi Trac 2 also compared with
Yokohama A539 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.