Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Toyo

Toyo Proxes TR1

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Toyo Proxes TR1 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
75/100
71 owner reviews
Dry
76
Wet
74
Comfort
76
Noise
96
Treadwear
71
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama A539

Summer High Performance tires

Yokohama A539 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
14 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
75
Comfort
82
Noise
–
Treadwear
78
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama A539 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A539 leads by 5
A — Toyo Proxes TR1
76
B — Yokohama A539
81
Why this score
SourceProxes TR1A539
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tyre Reviews owners 84 81

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A539 leads by 1
A — Toyo Proxes TR1
74
B — Yokohama A539
75
Why this score
SourceProxes TR1A539
Professional tests (TWG score) 73 –
Tyre Reviews owners 75 75

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A539 leads by 6
A — Toyo Proxes TR1
76
B — Yokohama A539
82
Why this score
SourceProxes TR1A539
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 67 82

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Toyo Proxes TR1
96
B — Yokohama A539
–
Why this score
SourceProxes TR1A539
Professional tests (TWG score) 96 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A539 leads by 7
A — Toyo Proxes TR1
71
B — Yokohama A539
78
Why this score
SourceProxes TR1A539
Tyre Reviews owners 71 78

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A539 leads by 4
A — Toyo Proxes TR1
81
B — Yokohama A539
85
Why this score
SourceProxes TR1A539
Tyre Reviews owners 81 85
DriverReviews owners 84 86

Scores at a glance

Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Yokohama A539: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes TR1Yokohama A539
Relative Score 75 79
Dry 76 81
Wet 74 75
Comfort 76 82
Noise 96 –
Treadwear 71 78
Handling 81 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Toyo Proxes TR1

The Toyo Proxes TR1 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in dry grip and provides a sporty, responsive driving experience. While many users praise its ability to transform vehicle handling, the consensus is tempered by frequent reports of significant road noise, soft sidewalls, and rapid tread wear, particularly under spirited driving conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement grip and cornering stability
  • Predictable and progressive handling at the limit
  • Aesthetically pleasing tread pattern
  • Improved steering feedback compared to standard touring tires

Cons

  • High levels of road noise, often described as a 'humming' or 'wheel bearing' sound
  • Soft sidewalls leading to a wobbly feel or lack of precision under heavy load
  • Rapid tread wear and potential for uneven cupping
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance, with some users reporting aquaplaning issues
  • Performance degradation as the tire reaches the end of its tread life

Observations

  • Mid-engined vehicle owners reported dissatisfaction with the soft sidewalls, noting a lack of stability during cornering compared to front-engined setups.
  • Users with lightweight hatchbacks and compact cars frequently cited the tire as a significant upgrade in handling and confidence for daily spirited driving.
  • Drivers of heavier or higher-horsepower vehicles noted faster tread wear and increased susceptibility to understeer when pushing the tires to their limits.
Tire B Yokohama A539

The Yokohama A539 is widely regarded as a dependable, classic-style tire that excels in providing predictable handling and reliable braking for older or smaller-displacement vehicles. While it is highly praised by owners of classic Minis and vintage hatchbacks for its cornering feedback, it is generally considered a capable all-rounder rather than a high-performance track tire.

Pros

  • Excellent cornering grip and handling feedback
  • Highly predictable and dependable performance
  • Strong braking capabilities in both wet and dry conditions
  • Well-suited for classic vehicle fitments and smaller wheel diameters

Cons

  • Can struggle with traction when cold
  • Limited performance in aggressive, high-power driving scenarios
  • Noticeable road noise when pushed to the limit
  • Wet weather performance can be inconsistent depending on vehicle weight and power

Observations

  • Highly favored for classic Mini applications, particularly in 13-inch sizes, where it is considered a top-tier choice.
  • Users note that while the tire performs well on lightweight vintage cars, it may exhibit wheel spin on more powerful or torque-heavy setups.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Toyo Proxes TR1

Mixed

Community opinions on the Toyo Proxes TR1 are mixed, with users highlighting its affordable price, progressive limit handling, and good dry grip for spirited driving or sliding. However, critics frequently point out issues with soft sidewalls that reduce steering precision, increased road noise over time, and mixed performance in wet or cold weather.

r/kereta ·2 upvotes ·2026-04-27

“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”

r/Miata ·1 upvote ·2025-02-18

“Tr1s are great for sliding and are very progressive at the limit but they have very sloppy sidewalls and do not have a lot of grip, it's very easy to lock up and can easily make you do a 4 wheel slide. Even the ancient PS3s have way more grip.”

r/Miata ·1 upvote ·2025-02-18

“Tr1 is a solid choice for relatively cheap grip They do suffer in the cold and wet but if it's a summer car that shouldn't be an issue”

r/subaru ·1 upvote ·2026-06-25

“Bekomme ich mit unterschiedliche Reifen Modelle Probleme mit dem Verteiler Getriebe? Hallo, ich habe mal eine Frage bezüglich Reifen und dem Verteilergetriebe. Ich habe vor ein paar Jahren einen gebrauchten Felgensatz gekauft auf dem Reifen aus dem Jahr 2016 waren Profiltiefe der Reifen war bei allen neuwertig. Anfang diesen Jahres habe ich mir dann hinten links einen Platten gefahren. Ich habe dann die Reifen hinten achsweise getauscht mit dem selben Reifen was verbaut war (neue toyo proxes tr1 Reifen. Unglücklicherweise habe ich jetzt wieder einen platten Reifen, allerdings vorne. Nun wollte ich wieder 2 neue Reifen für vorne bestellen (ebenfalls toyo proxes tr1). Leider läuft dieses Modell wohl aus und sind nicht mehr verfügbar. Meine Frage jetzt, kann ich andere Reifen Modelle nutzen (toyo comfort in den selben Maßen wie den Proxes tr1) oder sind diese problematisch? Vielen Dank im Voraus 🙂 Read more”

Top themes
#affordable budget performance#soft sidewall flex#progressive limit handling#wet and cold performance#road noise levels#sliding and drifting capability

Based on 16 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama A539

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes TR1 B · Yokohama A539
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama A539 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama A539 scores 78 vs 71 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A539 scores 82 vs 76 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama A539 scores 81 vs 76 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama A539 scores 85 vs 81 on handling.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire B · Yokohama A539

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.