55
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
41/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone All Season vs Yokohama A539 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama A539 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | All Season | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | All Season | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | 98 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | All Season | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 58 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | All Season | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | All Season | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | All Season | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
A539 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | All Season | A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 85 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone All Season | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 79 |
| Dry | 59 | 81 |
| Wet | 51 | 75 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 49 | 82 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 58 | 78 |
| Handling | 59 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Yokohama A539 is widely regarded as a dependable, classic-style tire that excels in providing predictable handling and reliable braking for older or smaller-displacement vehicles. While it is highly praised by owners of classic Minis and vintage hatchbacks for its cornering feedback, it is generally considered a capable all-rounder rather than a high-performance track tire.
Pros
- Excellent cornering grip and handling feedback
- Highly predictable and dependable performance
- Strong braking capabilities in both wet and dry conditions
- Well-suited for classic vehicle fitments and smaller wheel diameters
Cons
- Can struggle with traction when cold
- Limited performance in aggressive, high-power driving scenarios
- Noticeable road noise when pushed to the limit
- Wet weather performance can be inconsistent depending on vehicle weight and power
Observations
- Highly favored for classic Mini applications, particularly in 13-inch sizes, where it is considered a top-tier choice.
- Users note that while the tire performs well on lightweight vintage cars, it may exhibit wheel spin on more powerful or torque-heavy setups.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone All Season | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 62 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Firestone
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama A539 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama A539 scores 82 vs 49 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama A539 scores 85 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama A539 scores 75 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama A539 scores 81 vs 59 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone All Season
Tire B · Yokohama A539
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone All Season also compared with
Yokohama A539 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.