Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental PureContact LS vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental PureContact LS

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Continental PureContact LS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
79
Snow
48
Comfort
58
Noise
–
Treadwear
70
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental PureContact LS and Yokohama Advan Sport AS are within 2 points overall. Continental PureContact LS is stronger on wet, handling and dry. Yokohama Advan Sport AS is stronger on comfort and snow.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 9
A — Continental PureContact LS
86
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 86 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 12
A — Continental PureContact LS
79
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners 79 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 12
A — Continental PureContact LS
48
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 48 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 22
A — Continental PureContact LS
58
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 58 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental PureContact LS
–
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 1
A — Continental PureContact LS
70
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 70 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 12
A — Continental PureContact LS
85
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 85 73

Scores at a glance

Continental PureContact LS vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental PureContact LSYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 86 77
Wet 79 67
Snow 48 60
Comfort 58 80
Noise – 76
Treadwear 70 71
Handling 85 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental PureContact LS

The Continental PureContact LS receives a polarized reception from users, balancing praise for its longevity and wet-weather performance against significant complaints regarding noise levels and cold-weather flat-spotting. While some drivers appreciate the tire's luxury-oriented ride and tread life, others report inconsistent quality and frustrating vibration issues that detract from the overall ownership experience.

Pros

  • Extended tread life compared to performance-oriented alternatives
  • Reliable grip and stability in wet road conditions
  • Comfortable, vibration-isolating ride quality
  • Improved handling characteristics over many original equipment tires

Cons

  • Persistent flat-spotting issues, particularly in colder temperatures
  • Excessive road noise and humming at highway speeds
  • Diminished traction and grip performance as the tread wears down
  • Inconsistent winter weather capability

Observations

  • Owners of luxury sedans like the Lexus ES 350 and Lincoln Continental reported significant issues with morning flat-spotting and vibrations.
  • Users transitioning from performance-focused tires, such as the ExtremeContact DWS 06, noted a distinct trade-off between increased tread life and a loss of sporty steering feedback.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategoryAll Season Ultra High Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG700 A A440 A A
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Too close to call: Continental PureContact LS and Yokohama Advan Sport AS are within 2 points overall. Continental PureContact LS is stronger on wet, handling and dry. Yokohama Advan Sport AS is stronger on comfort and snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 79 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental PureContact LS scores 85 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 60 vs 48 on snow.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.