72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Continental VanContact Winter — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental VanContact Winter — better wet, treadwear and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A/T KO2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 70 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
VanContact Winter leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
A/T KO2 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
VanContact Winter leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 65 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
VanContact Winter leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 90 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
VanContact Winter leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 55 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Continental VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 74 |
| Dry | 84 | 70 |
| Wet | 64 | 80 |
| Snow | 92 | 70 |
| Comfort | 61 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 90 |
| Handling | 50 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
74
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Continental VanContact Winter is generally regarded as a reliable performer in cold, wet, and snowy conditions, making it a functional choice for commercial van applications. While it offers commendable tread longevity, users report compromises in dry handling, cornering stability, and cabin noise levels.
Pros
- Reliable traction on snow-covered roads
- Strong performance in cold, wet weather
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
Cons
- Noticeable understeer during cornering
- Subpar handling performance in dry conditions
- High levels of road noise at lower speeds
Observations
- Users operating heavy, loaded work vans report significant understeer issues during cornering maneuvers.
- The tire demonstrates high durability for commercial use, with reports of reaching 32,000 miles while maintaining legal tread depth.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Continental VanContact Winter |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | — | Van |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 79 - 90 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich
74
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental VanContact Winter — better wet, treadwear and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich A/T KO2 if snow and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 92 vs 70 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental VanContact Winter scores 80 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 84 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental VanContact Winter scores 90 vs 80 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Continental VanContact Winter
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 also compared with
Continental VanContact Winter also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.