Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Yokohama Geolander M/T — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich A/T KO2

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
64
Snow
92
Comfort
61
Treadwear
80
Handling
50

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolander M/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Yokohama Geolander M/T tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
Owner ratings
Dry
67
Wet
80
Snow
–
Comfort
80
Treadwear
20
Handling
50

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich A/T KO2 — better treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolander M/T if comfort and wet matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A/T KO2 leads by 17
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
84
B — Yokohama Geolander M/T
67
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 83 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Geolander M/T leads by 16
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
64
B — Yokohama Geolander M/T
80
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 60 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
92
B — Yokohama Geolander M/T
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolander M/T leads by 19
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
61
B — Yokohama Geolander M/T
80
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 57 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A/T KO2 leads by 60
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
80
B — Yokohama Geolander M/T
20
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 79 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich A/T KO2
50
B — Yokohama Geolander M/T
50
Why this score
SourceA/T KO2Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 50 –

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Yokohama Geolander M/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich A/T KO2Yokohama Geolander M/T
Relative Score 69 57
Dry 84 67
Wet 64 80
Snow 92 –
Comfort 61 80
Treadwear 80 20
Handling 50 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich A/T KO2

The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
  • Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
  • Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
  • Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise during daily driving
  • Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
  • Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options

Observations

  • Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
  • The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
Tire B Yokohama Geolander M/T

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 B · Yokohama Geolander M/T
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tiresAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Yokohama

Winner: BFGoodrich A/T KO2 — better treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama Geolander M/T if comfort and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 80 vs 20 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolander M/T scores 80 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 84 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolander M/T scores 80 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolander M/T

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.