89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
37 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Yokohama Geolander M/T — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
59
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Destination M/T2 | Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Destination M/T2 | Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Destination M/T2 | Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Destination M/T2 | Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Destination M/T2 | Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 78 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 60
Why this score
| Source | Destination M/T2 | Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination M/T2 | Yokohama Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 59 |
| Dry | 96 | 67 |
| Wet | 93 | 80 |
| Snow | 92 | – |
| Comfort | 90 | 80 |
| Noise | 77 | – |
| Treadwear | 80 | 20 |
| Handling | – | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
59
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Destination M/T2 is widely regarded as a high-performing mud-terrain tire that balances aggressive off-road capability with surprising on-road civility. While most users praise its traction in mud, sand, and snow, consistent maintenance—specifically regular rotation—is frequently cited as the key to avoiding premature wear and noise issues.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Surprisingly low road noise levels for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong durability and tread life when maintained with regular rotations
- Good on-road handling and stability, even on heavy-duty trucks
- Excellent value proposition compared to premium-priced competitors
Cons
- Susceptibility to cupping and increased noise if rotation intervals are neglected
- Potential for rapid tread wear on heavy-duty vehicles if not properly managed
- Initial 'break-in' period required for optimal grip on slick surfaces like road paint
- Occasional reports of balancing issues or vibration at high interstate speeds
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (F-250/350, Ram 2500) report excellent performance under load, though they emphasize the necessity of strict 5,000-mile rotation schedules to prevent uneven wear.
- Jeep owners note that the tire balances well and provides a ride quality that is often superior to stock tires, despite the aggressive tread pattern.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination M/T2 | B · Yokohama Geolander M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 19/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Firestone
59
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 80 vs 20 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 96 vs 67 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 93 vs 80 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 90 vs 80 on comfort.
Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolander M/T
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Destination M/T2 also compared with
Yokohama Geolander M/T also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.