80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
73/100
38 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Firestone Destination M/T2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
37 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better wet, comfort and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Destination M/T2 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 78 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | Firestone Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 88 |
| Dry | 82 | 96 |
| Wet | 67 | 93 |
| Snow | 81 | 92 |
| Comfort | 72 | 90 |
| Noise | 100 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 80 |
| Handling | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is widely regarded as a benchmark for off-road durability and rugged versatility, excelling in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain. While users praise its longevity and aggressive aesthetic, there is a consistent consensus regarding its declining performance in wet conditions and increased road noise as the rubber compound hardens over time.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road durability and puncture resistance
- Strong traction in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain
- Long tread life and high mileage capability
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality as the tire ages
- Rubber compound tends to harden, negatively impacting cold-weather and wet-surface traction
- Poor performance on ice and hard-packed snow
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles or vans (e.g., Sprinter) report varying experiences with noise and comfort, often noting that the tire's weight impacts ride quality.
- Owners of heavy-duty 4x4s and trucks frequently highlight the tire's ability to handle high-speed gravel and heavy loads without structural failure.
The Firestone Destination M/T2 is widely regarded as a high-performing mud-terrain tire that balances aggressive off-road capability with surprising on-road civility. While most users praise its traction in mud, sand, and snow, consistent maintenance—specifically regular rotation—is frequently cited as the key to avoiding premature wear and noise issues.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Surprisingly low road noise levels for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong durability and tread life when maintained with regular rotations
- Good on-road handling and stability, even on heavy-duty trucks
- Excellent value proposition compared to premium-priced competitors
Cons
- Susceptibility to cupping and increased noise if rotation intervals are neglected
- Potential for rapid tread wear on heavy-duty vehicles if not properly managed
- Initial 'break-in' period required for optimal grip on slick surfaces like road paint
- Occasional reports of balancing issues or vibration at high interstate speeds
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (F-250/350, Ram 2500) report excellent performance under load, though they emphasize the necessity of strict 5,000-mile rotation schedules to prevent uneven wear.
- Jeep owners note that the tire balances well and provides a ride quality that is often superior to stock tires, despite the aggressive tread pattern.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | B · Firestone Destination M/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 16 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | 19/32″ |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
BFGoodrich
88
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better wet, comfort and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 93 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 scores 100 vs 77 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 90 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 96 vs 82 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
Tire B · Firestone Destination M/T2
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 also compared with
Firestone Destination M/T2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.