Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 vs Yokohama Geolander M/T — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
74 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
90
Snow
92
Comfort
91
Noise
92
Treadwear
92
Handling
88
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolander M/T

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Yokohama Geolander M/T tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
Owner ratings
Dry
67
Wet
80
Snow
–
Comfort
80
Noise
–
Treadwear
20
Handling
50
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT KL71 leads by 28
A
95
B
67
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture MT KL71Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 86 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT KL71 leads by 10
A
90
B
80
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture MT KL71Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 84 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
92
B
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT KL71 leads by 11
A
91
B
80
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture MT KL71Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 77 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
92
B
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT KL71 leads by 72
A
92
B
20
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture MT KL71Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT KL71 leads by 38
A
88
B
50
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture MT KL71Geolander M/T
Tyre Reviews owners 59 –
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryKumho Road Venture MT KL71Yokohama Geolander M/T
Relative Score 91 57
Dry 95 67
Wet 90 80
Snow 92 –
Comfort 91 80
Noise 92 –
Treadwear 92 20
Handling 88 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Road Venture MT KL71

The Kumho Road Venture M/T KL71 is widely regarded as an exceptional value-oriented mud-terrain tire that defies expectations regarding road noise and on-pavement comfort. While most users praise its aggressive off-road capabilities in mud, sand, and snow, a minority of owners report issues with ride quality, vibration, or uneven wear patterns.

Pros

  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong off-road traction in mud, sand, and gravel
  • Impressive on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Durable tread life when properly maintained

Cons

  • Reports of vibration or 'bouncing' on certain heavy-duty trucks
  • Potential for uneven wear or cupping if not rotated regularly
  • Some users noted a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
  • Harder rubber compound can lead to reduced wet-weather traction if not driven cautiously

Observations

  • Users with heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Dodge RAM 2500) reported more significant ride quality issues and vibrations compared to those with lighter SUVs or Jeeps.
  • Owners of smaller SUVs and older Jeeps frequently noted improved comfort and noise levels compared to previous sets of BFGoodrich tires.
  • The tire has proven versatile enough for unconventional applications, including high-performance electric vehicles and camper vans, where users praised its winter performance.
Tire B Yokohama Geolander M/T

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 B · Yokohama Geolander M/T
Category—All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 scores 92 vs 20 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 scores 88 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 scores 95 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture MT KL71 scores 91 vs 80 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Road Venture MT KL71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolander M/T
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.