Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental VikingContact 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 860 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 89 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 92 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 86 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 62 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 83 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental VikingContact 6 | Continental WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 83 |
| Dry | 68 | 81 |
| Wet | 75 | 90 |
| Snow | 60 | 78 |
| Comfort | 73 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 83 |
| Handling | 67 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental VikingContact 6 is widely regarded as a specialized winter performer that excels in deep snow and mountain conditions. While users praise its exceptional snow traction and impressive durability, performance tends to degrade significantly as the tread wears down, and handling on dry or warm pavement is often described as vague or noisy.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and confidence in deep snow
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Good performance in cold, wet, and slushy conditions
- Acceptable road noise levels
Cons
- Noticeable loss of snow and ice grip as tread depth decreases
- Vague steering feedback and lack of road feel
- Squeaking and handling issues on dry, warm tarmac
- Higher rolling resistance compared to all-season alternatives
Observations
- Users with all-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Quattro systems) noted that the tire's limitations on ice are mitigated by vehicle drivetrain capabilities.
- The tire maintains high performance even when used outside of its intended 'Nordic' climate, performing well in mild, wet winter conditions.
The Continental WinterContact TS 860 is widely regarded as a top-tier, balanced winter tire that excels in wet and snowy conditions while maintaining impressive comfort and low noise levels. While the vast majority of users report high satisfaction with its safety and handling, a minority of owners noted a significant drop in performance as the tires aged or after several seasons of use.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and safety in wet and slushy conditions
- Outstanding performance on snow, providing high levels of confidence
- Remarkably low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong fuel efficiency and balanced overall performance
- Predictable handling on dry roads, often compared favorably to summer tires
Cons
- Performance degradation noted by some users after 3-4 seasons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a slight loss of steering precision or 'wobble' in tight corners
- Tread pattern prone to picking up and throwing stones/sand
- Inconsistent reports regarding tread wear, with some users experiencing faster-than-expected depletion
Observations
- Users with high-torque vehicles noted that the tire can struggle with traction under heavy acceleration on snow if the vehicle lacks advanced torque management.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., VW Polo, Golf) reported excellent handling and confidence in varied winter conditions.
- Some users noted that the tire's soft sidewall is more noticeable on larger rim sizes or during spirited driving.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 6 | B · Continental WinterContact TS 860 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Continental
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860 — better handling, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 86 vs 67 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 78 vs 60 on snow.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 90 vs 75 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 scores 81 vs 68 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.