74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
68/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental VikingContact 6 vs Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
69 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
SP Sport FM800 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
SP Sport FM800 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
SP Sport FM800 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 84 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 84 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
SP Sport FM800 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 6 | SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 83 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental VikingContact 6 | Dunlop SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 84 |
| Dry | 68 | 88 |
| Wet | 75 | 86 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 73 | 84 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 82 |
| Handling | 67 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental VikingContact 6 is widely regarded as a specialized winter performer that excels in deep snow and mountain conditions. While users praise its exceptional snow traction and impressive durability, performance tends to degrade significantly as the tread wears down, and handling on dry or warm pavement is often described as vague or noisy.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and confidence in deep snow
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Good performance in cold, wet, and slushy conditions
- Acceptable road noise levels
Cons
- Noticeable loss of snow and ice grip as tread depth decreases
- Vague steering feedback and lack of road feel
- Squeaking and handling issues on dry, warm tarmac
- Higher rolling resistance compared to all-season alternatives
Observations
- Users with all-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., Quattro systems) noted that the tire's limitations on ice are mitigated by vehicle drivetrain capabilities.
- The tire maintains high performance even when used outside of its intended 'Nordic' climate, performing well in mild, wet winter conditions.
The Dunlop SP Sport FM800 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-budget tire that punches above its weight class in terms of wet and dry grip, comfort, and noise suppression. While most users praise its performance-to-price ratio, some report inconsistent tread longevity and a decline in performance as the rubber compound hardens over time.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Predictable handling and progressive grip limits
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
- Performance degradation as the tire ages/hardens
- Not suitable for high-horsepower or aggressive track use
- Occasional reports of sidewall stiffness or lack of steering precision
Observations
- Users on smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., VW Up, Ford Focus) report excellent handling and satisfaction.
- Drivers of high-performance or heavy vehicles (e.g., C63s AMG, Jaguar XF) noted that the tire struggles with high torque and may experience premature or uneven wear.
- Some users noted that steering feel can be perceived as vague on certain tire profiles, likely due to sidewall construction.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 6 | B · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Continental
84
/ 100
Dunlop
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 88 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 83 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 86 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 84 vs 73 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental VikingContact 6
Tire B · Dunlop SP Sport FM800
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental VikingContact 6 also compared with
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.