75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
7 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
30 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental VikingContact 7 vs Firestone Winterforce 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
27 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Winterforce 2 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental VikingContact 7 if handling, comfort and noise matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Winterforce 2 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 48 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 58 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Winterforce 2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 48 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | 97 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Winterforce 2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | 97 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
VikingContact 7 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 58 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
VikingContact 7 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | 78 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Winterforce 2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
VikingContact 7 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 50 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental VikingContact 7 | Firestone Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 81 |
| Dry | 59 | 83 |
| Wet | 76 | 89 |
| Snow | 86 | 96 |
| Comfort | 88 | 81 |
| Noise | 84 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 82 |
| Handling | 71 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test | 6% #17/17 · 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | +27.5 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental VikingContact 7 is widely regarded as a premium, well-rounded studless winter tire that excels in comfort, noise suppression, and slush performance. While it receives high praise for its predictable handling and stability on cold, dry, or wet pavement, user consensus suggests it may slightly trail dedicated ice-focused competitors like the Bridgestone Blizzak in extreme stopping grip on pure ice.
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in slush and deep snow
- Stable and predictable handling at highway speeds
- Excellent dry and wet road manners for a winter tire
Cons
- Mixed reports regarding tread life and longevity
- Noticeable decline in ice-braking performance compared to top-tier ice specialists
- Compound may harden or performance may degrade after multiple seasons
- Potential for reduced traction if driven in warmer, non-winter conditions
Observations
- Users noted that the tire maintains excellent fuel economy and low noise levels even on electric vehicles like the Tesla Model 3 and Mazda MX-30.
- Drivers of rear-wheel-drive sports cars (e.g., Mazda Miata) reported that the tire's soft compound can feel overwhelmed during aggressive acceleration on dry pavement.
- Downsizing to a smaller wheel diameter (e.g., -2 from OE) was successfully used to improve the tire's profile and winter performance on hybrid SUVs.
The Firestone WinterForce 2 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly winter tire that excels in deep snow and challenging winter conditions. While it earns high praise for its aggressive traction and affordability, users note compromises in dry-road handling, road noise, and ice performance compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
- Highly competitive price point
- Reliable performance for daily winter commuting
- Effective water displacement in wet conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
- Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
- Limited performance on ice without studs
- Faster tread wear when used year-round
Observations
- Users with RWD vehicles report significant improvements in winter drivability, though some note a lack of dry-handling precision.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Ford Focus) report high satisfaction with snow-clearing capabilities.
- Some users report a harsh ride quality on older SUVs, suggesting the tire's construction may be less forgiving on certain chassis types.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 7 | B · Firestone Winterforce 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | 31 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 14″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
81
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Winterforce 2 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental VikingContact 7 if handling, comfort and noise matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Winterforce 2 scores 83 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 71 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Winterforce 2 scores 82 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Winterforce 2 scores 89 vs 76 on wet.
Tire A · Continental VikingContact 7
Tire B · Firestone Winterforce 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental VikingContact 7 also compared with
Firestone Winterforce 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.