75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
7 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
30 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental VikingContact 7 vs Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 — better dry, handling and treadwear. Pick the Continental VikingContact 7 if wet and noise matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 48 | 59 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 92% | 93% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
VikingContact 7 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 64 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 86% | 84% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 95% | 96% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 96 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 100% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 94% | 96% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 100% | 97% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 92 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
VikingContact 7 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental VikingContact 7 | Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 78 |
| Dry | 59 | 71 |
| Wet | 76 | 68 |
| Snow | 86 | 88 |
| Comfort | 88 | 92 |
| Noise | 84 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 78 |
| Handling | 71 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 92% #13/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 93% #9/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | -0.9 | Same test |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 96% #4/8 · 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test | 96% #4/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | -0.3 | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Ice | 79% #11/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 70% #15/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | +8.7 | Same test |
| Ice Handling | Ice | 95% #2/8 · 2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test | 95% #6/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | -0.5 | Different tests |
| Ice Traction | Ice | 84% #4/8 · 2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test | 90% #15/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | -5.1 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #1/8 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews Studless Winter Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | -0.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #8/8 · 2020 Vi Bilagare Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | 69% #6/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | +30.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/8 · 2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test | 33% #3/17 · 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test | 97% #14/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | +3.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 94% #2/8 · 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test | 96% #5/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | -2.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test | 97% #13/20 · 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test | +3.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #3/8 · 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test | 73% #5/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | +22.4 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #3/8 · 2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test | 80% #4/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Noise | Subj | 100% #1/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 90% #5/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | +10 | Same test |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 86% #6/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | 84% #9/16 · 2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test | +1.5 | Same test |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #5/8 · 2020 Vi Bilagare Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | 96% #6/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test | -0.5 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental VikingContact 7 is widely regarded as a premium, well-rounded studless winter tire that excels in comfort, noise suppression, and slush performance. While it receives high praise for its predictable handling and stability on cold, dry, or wet pavement, user consensus suggests it may slightly trail dedicated ice-focused competitors like the Bridgestone Blizzak in extreme stopping grip on pure ice.
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in slush and deep snow
- Stable and predictable handling at highway speeds
- Excellent dry and wet road manners for a winter tire
Cons
- Mixed reports regarding tread life and longevity
- Noticeable decline in ice-braking performance compared to top-tier ice specialists
- Compound may harden or performance may degrade after multiple seasons
- Potential for reduced traction if driven in warmer, non-winter conditions
Observations
- Users noted that the tire maintains excellent fuel economy and low noise levels even on electric vehicles like the Tesla Model 3 and Mazda MX-30.
- Drivers of rear-wheel-drive sports cars (e.g., Mazda Miata) reported that the tire's soft compound can feel overwhelmed during aggressive acceleration on dry pavement.
- Downsizing to a smaller wheel diameter (e.g., -2 from OE) was successfully used to improve the tire's profile and winter performance on hybrid SUVs.
The Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in deep snow and provides a comfortable, communicative driving experience. While it offers impressive traction in wintry conditions, users note that its performance is less refined on ice and that the compound is prone to accelerated wear when used in dry, warmer conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and plowing capability in deep snow
- High level of ride comfort and stability during long-distance driving
- Excellent steering feedback and surface communication
- Strong value proposition relative to price
Cons
- Rapid tread wear when driven on dry pavement
- Limited grip and confidence on icy surfaces
- Reduced performance and stability during aggressive driving maneuvers
- Not optimized for regions with infrequent snowfall
Observations
- Users report the tire is well-suited for city driving and daily commuting rather than high-performance or aggressive driving styles.
- The tire's soft compound provides a comfortable ride but necessitates careful driving in dry, non-winter conditions to preserve tread life.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 7 | B · Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
78
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 — better dry, handling and treadwear. Pick the Continental VikingContact 7 if wet and noise matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 scores 71 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 scores 82 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 scores 78 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental VikingContact 7 scores 76 vs 68 on wet.
Tire A · Continental VikingContact 7
Tire B · Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental VikingContact 7 also compared with
Hankook Winter I*cept iZ2 W616 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.