75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
7 professional tests
User signal (40%)
78/100
30 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental VikingContact 7 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Continental VikingContact 7 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 48 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | VikingContact 7 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental VikingContact 7 | Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | – |
| Dry | 59 | – |
| Wet | 76 | – |
| Snow | 86 | – |
| Comfort | 88 | – |
| Noise | 84 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | – |
| Handling | 71 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
–
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test | 7% #14/17 · 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | +26.2 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental VikingContact 7 is widely regarded as a premium, well-rounded studless winter tire that excels in comfort, noise suppression, and slush performance. While it receives high praise for its predictable handling and stability on cold, dry, or wet pavement, user consensus suggests it may slightly trail dedicated ice-focused competitors like the Bridgestone Blizzak in extreme stopping grip on pure ice.
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in slush and deep snow
- Stable and predictable handling at highway speeds
- Excellent dry and wet road manners for a winter tire
Cons
- Mixed reports regarding tread life and longevity
- Noticeable decline in ice-braking performance compared to top-tier ice specialists
- Compound may harden or performance may degrade after multiple seasons
- Potential for reduced traction if driven in warmer, non-winter conditions
Observations
- Users noted that the tire maintains excellent fuel economy and low noise levels even on electric vehicles like the Tesla Model 3 and Mazda MX-30.
- Drivers of rear-wheel-drive sports cars (e.g., Mazda Miata) reported that the tire's soft compound can feel overwhelmed during aggressive acceleration on dry pavement.
- Downsizing to a smaller wheel diameter (e.g., -2 from OE) was successfully used to improve the tire's profile and winter performance on hybrid SUVs.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental VikingContact 7 | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
–
/ 100
Yokohama
Only Continental VikingContact 7 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Continental VikingContact 7
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental VikingContact 7 also compared with
Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.