Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S vs Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

Winter Ultra High Performance tires

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
85/100
14 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
81
Snow
87
Comfort
88
Noise
42
Treadwear
88
Handling
87

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Vredestein

Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme

Winter High Performance tires

Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
44 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
89
Snow
80
Comfort
88
Noise
–
Treadwear
83
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — better handling, snow and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme if wet matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 860 S leads by 3
A — Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
89
B — Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
86
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 860 SWintrac 4 Extreme
Professional tests (TWG score) 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 84 86

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Wintrac 4 Extreme leads by 8
A — Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
81
B — Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
89
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 860 SWintrac 4 Extreme
Professional tests (TWG score) 80 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 89

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 860 S leads by 7
A — Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
87
B — Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
80
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 860 SWintrac 4 Extreme
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 89 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
88
B — Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
88
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 860 SWintrac 4 Extreme
Tyre Reviews owners 88 88

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
42
B — Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
–
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 860 SWintrac 4 Extreme
Professional tests (TWG score) 42 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 860 S leads by 5
A — Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
88
B — Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
83
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 860 SWintrac 4 Extreme
Tyre Reviews owners 88 83

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 860 S leads by 9
A — Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
87
B — Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
78
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 860 SWintrac 4 Extreme
Tyre Reviews owners 87 78

Scores at a glance

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S vs Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental WinterContact TS 860 SVredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
Relative Score 86 84
Dry 89 86
Wet 81 89
Snow 87 80
Comfort 88 88
Noise 42 –
Treadwear 88 83
Handling 87 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

The Continental WinterContact TS 860 S is widely regarded as a premium performance winter tire that excels in cold, dry, and wet conditions, often mimicking the handling characteristics of a summer tire. While the majority of users praise its sporty feedback and snow traction, some owners report specific issues with lateral grip in wet conditions and potential compatibility challenges with staggered wheel setups.

Pros

  • Exceptional handling and feedback on dry and wet roads in cold temperatures
  • Strong performance and confidence in snow and icy conditions
  • Stiffer sidewalls compared to predecessors, offering improved cornering stability
  • High durability and slow tread wear over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Long break-in period required before optimal grip is achieved
  • Potential for traction control interference on staggered RWD setups due to circumference variances
  • Limited lateral grip in wet conditions compared to some competitors
  • High price point relative to other winter tire options

Observations

  • Users with staggered RWD setups reported significant issues with traction control systems when using non-OEM specific tire variants.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW M2) noted that the stiffer sidewalls provide a more precise, less 'squishy' feel during spirited driving.
Tire B Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme

The Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme is widely regarded by users as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow, ice, and cold, wet conditions. While it offers exceptional traction and safety margins in harsh weather, users note that its performance degrades in warmer temperatures, where the compound becomes soft and handling feels less precise.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and stability in deep snow and on ice
  • Strong performance in cold, wet, and greasy road conditions
  • Impressive tread longevity and durability
  • High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
  • Noticeable improvement in handling and confidence over standard summer or all-season tires

Cons

  • Reduced handling precision and 'squidgy' feel in temperatures above 13°C
  • Initial stiffness or harsh ride quality during the break-in period
  • Increased tread wear if used consistently in warm summer weather
  • Less effective on clay-based mud when tread depth drops below 4mm

Observations

  • Owners of heavy SUVs and 4x4s (e.g., Land Rover Freelander, Volvo XC90) frequently report that these tires transform vehicle capability in extreme winter conditions.
  • Users noted that the tires significantly improved the handling of rear-wheel-drive vehicles, which are typically prone to losing traction in cold weather.
  • Some users reported a harsh ride initially on larger wheel sizes, which improved significantly after a break-in period of approximately 2,000 miles.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S B · Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme
CategoryWinter Ultra High Performance tiresWinter High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available4—
Rim diameters18″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 11/32″—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Vredestein

Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — better handling, snow and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 87 vs 78 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 89 vs 81 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 87 vs 80 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 88 vs 83 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
Tire B · Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.