82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Cooper CS4 Touring vs Falken Eurowinter HS439 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Cooper CS4 Touring and Falken Eurowinter HS439 are within 2 points overall. Cooper CS4 Touring is stronger on comfort. Falken Eurowinter HS439 is stronger on treadwear, dry and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS439 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | CS4 Touring | Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 86 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS439 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | CS4 Touring | Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CS4 Touring | Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CS4 Touring leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | CS4 Touring | Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS439 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | CS4 Touring | Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eurowinter HS439 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | CS4 Touring | Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper CS4 Touring | Falken Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 82 |
| Dry | 82 | 86 |
| Wet | 80 | 83 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 92 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 83 |
| Handling | 80 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Falken Eurowinter HS439 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering performance comparable to premium brands at a lower price point. While users appreciate its predictable handling and durability, many note that the design feels dated, particularly regarding wet-weather braking and overall refinement compared to modern alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence on snow and ice
- High value-for-money proposition
- Good tread longevity and durability
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Mediocre wet-weather braking performance
- Increased road noise compared to summer tires
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage on poor road surfaces
- Dated performance characteristics compared to newer tire generations
Observations
- Users noted that the tire requires a 'run-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal grip levels.
- Drivers of rear-wheel-drive vehicles reported significant improvements in winter mobility, though some noted concerns regarding sidewall robustness on pothole-prone roads.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper CS4 Touring | B · Falken Eurowinter HS439 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 520 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Cooper
82
/ 100
Falken
Too close to call: Cooper CS4 Touring and Falken Eurowinter HS439 are within 2 points overall. Cooper CS4 Touring is stronger on comfort. Falken Eurowinter HS439 is stronger on treadwear, dry and wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Cooper CS4 Touring scores 92 vs 77 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken Eurowinter HS439 scores 83 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Eurowinter HS439 scores 86 vs 82 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken Eurowinter HS439 scores 83 vs 80 on wet.
Tire A · Cooper CS4 Touring
Tire B · Falken Eurowinter HS439
More comparisons
Also compared with
Cooper CS4 Touring also compared with
Falken Eurowinter HS439 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.