Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Falken Eurowinter HS439 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Winter Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
66/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
20 owner reviews
Dry
68
Wet
67
Snow
76
Comfort
84
Noise
77
Treadwear
79
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken Eurowinter HS439

Winter Touring tires

Falken Eurowinter HS439 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
17 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
83
Snow
60
Comfort
77
Noise
–
Treadwear
83
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken Eurowinter HS439 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if snow and comfort matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS439 leads by 18
A — Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
68
B — Falken Eurowinter HS439
86
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Eurowinter HS439
Professional tests (TWG score) 58 –
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 70 86
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS439 leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
67
B — Falken Eurowinter HS439
83
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Eurowinter HS439
Professional tests (TWG score) 55 –
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 83
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak WS90 leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
76
B — Falken Eurowinter HS439
60
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Eurowinter HS439
Professional tests (TWG score) 65 –
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 100 60
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak WS90 leads by 7
A — Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
84
B — Falken Eurowinter HS439
77
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Eurowinter HS439
Professional tests (TWG score) 86 –
Tire Rack owners 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 64 77
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
77
B — Falken Eurowinter HS439
–
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Eurowinter HS439
SimpleTire owners 77 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS439 leads by 4
A — Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
79
B — Falken Eurowinter HS439
83
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Eurowinter HS439
Tire Rack owners 84 –
Tyre Reviews owners 73 83
SimpleTire owners 82 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eurowinter HS439 leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
65
B — Falken Eurowinter HS439
81
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Eurowinter HS439
Tyre Reviews owners 65 81

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Falken Eurowinter HS439: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak WS90Falken Eurowinter HS439
Relative Score 73 79
Dry 68 86
Wet 67 83
Snow 76 60
Comfort 84 77
Noise 77 –
Treadwear 79 83
Handling 65 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance on ice, deep snow, and slush. While users occasionally note increased road noise or less precise handling on dry pavement compared to all-season alternatives, the consensus remains that it is a premier choice for severe winter climates.

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
  • Strong capability in slush and deep snow
  • High level of driver confidence in extreme weather

Cons

  • Increased road noise during highway driving
  • Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
  • Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
  • Perceived as less refined in dry conditions compared to the previous WS80 generation

Observations

  • Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles without modern traction control reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain mobility.
  • Drivers of front-wheel-drive sedans noted significant improvements in winter handling and the ability to avoid using four-wheel-drive modes in moderate conditions.
Tire B Falken Eurowinter HS439

The Falken Eurowinter HS439 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering performance comparable to premium brands at a lower price point. While users appreciate its predictable handling and durability, many note that the design feels dated, particularly regarding wet-weather braking and overall refinement compared to modern alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent traction and confidence on snow and ice
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Good tread longevity and durability
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Mediocre wet-weather braking performance
  • Increased road noise compared to summer tires
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage on poor road surfaces
  • Dated performance characteristics compared to newer tire generations

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire requires a 'run-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal grip levels.
  • Drivers of rear-wheel-drive vehicles reported significant improvements in winter mobility, though some noted concerns regarding sidewall robustness on pothole-prone roads.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 B · Falken Eurowinter HS439
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tiresWinter Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available45—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Falken

Winner: Falken Eurowinter HS439 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if snow and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Eurowinter HS439 scores 86 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 76 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Eurowinter HS439 scores 83 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Eurowinter HS439 scores 81 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Tire B · Falken Eurowinter HS439

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.