77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Falken Azenis PT722 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
82/100
115 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R — better wet and handling. Pick the Falken Azenis PT722 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Azenis PT722 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | ADVAN Neova AD08R |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 95 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD08R leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | ADVAN Neova AD08R |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Azenis PT722 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | ADVAN Neova AD08R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 70 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Azenis PT722 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | ADVAN Neova AD08R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD08R leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | ADVAN Neova AD08R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 93 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis PT722 | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 80 |
| Dry | 80 | 78 |
| Wet | 62 | 81 |
| Comfort | 78 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 88 | 74 |
| Handling | 78 | 93 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis PT722 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that excels in longevity and ride comfort. While many users praise its quiet operation and exceptional tread life, consensus is polarized regarding wet-weather performance and traction consistency, with some drivers reporting significant grip issues in rain.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Excellent value for the price point
- Stable and smooth handling at highway speeds
Cons
- Unpredictable or poor traction in wet conditions
- Lack of progressive grip when reaching traction limits
- Inconsistent performance across different vehicle platforms
- Sudden loss of traction without warning
Observations
- Users with heavier SUVs like the BMW X3 reported impressive longevity, exceeding 60,000 km with minimal tread wear.
- Drivers of rear-wheel-drive sedans, such as the Lexus IS250, reported significant traction issues, suggesting the tire may struggle with the power delivery of certain RWD configurations.
The Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R is widely regarded as a high-performance, track-oriented tire that excels in dry grip, steering precision, and communicative feedback. While it offers impressive capabilities for spirited driving and track days, users note that it requires heat to reach peak performance and can be noisy and stiff for daily commuting.
Pros
- Exceptional dry pavement grip and cornering stability
- Razor-sharp steering response and high-quality road feedback
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit
- Stiff sidewall construction that enhances handling precision
Cons
- High levels of road noise, often described as a humming or bearing-like sound
- Stiff ride quality that can compromise daily driving comfort
- Performance degradation in standing water or heavy rain
- Rapid tread wear, particularly when subjected to frequent track use
Observations
- Users with lightweight, agile vehicles (e.g., Lotus Elise, GT86) report that the tire significantly enhances turn-in and handling precision.
- Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles note that the tire provides excellent traction for launches but can be sensitive to tire pressure management to avoid overheating.
- Some users with staggered setups on specific platforms (e.g., Focus ST) noted that incorrect sizing can lead to rubbing issues due to the tire's stiff, reinforced sidewall profile.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis PT722 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Falken
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R — better wet and handling. Pick the Falken Azenis PT722 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 81 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 93 vs 78 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 88 vs 74 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 78 vs 75 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken Azenis PT722
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken Azenis PT722 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.