77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken Azenis PT722 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Falken Azenis PT722 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Azenis PT722 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Solus TA31 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 57 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 43 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Azenis PT722 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Azenis PT722 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 61 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Azenis PT722 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Azenis PT722 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis PT722 | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 67 |
| Dry | 80 | 75 |
| Wet | 62 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 44 |
| Comfort | 78 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 88 | 63 |
| Handling | 78 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis PT722 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that excels in longevity and ride comfort. While many users praise its quiet operation and exceptional tread life, consensus is polarized regarding wet-weather performance and traction consistency, with some drivers reporting significant grip issues in rain.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Excellent value for the price point
- Stable and smooth handling at highway speeds
Cons
- Unpredictable or poor traction in wet conditions
- Lack of progressive grip when reaching traction limits
- Inconsistent performance across different vehicle platforms
- Sudden loss of traction without warning
Observations
- Users with heavier SUVs like the BMW X3 reported impressive longevity, exceeding 60,000 km with minimal tread wear.
- Drivers of rear-wheel-drive sedans, such as the Lexus IS250, reported significant traction issues, suggesting the tire may struggle with the power delivery of certain RWD configurations.
The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong value for money
- Attractive aesthetic design
- Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving
Cons
- Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
- Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
- Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
- Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis PT722 | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 19 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Falken
67
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Falken Azenis PT722 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 88 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 78 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 80 vs 75 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 78 vs 74 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken Azenis PT722
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken Azenis PT722 also compared with
Kumho Solus TA31 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.