73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
211 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken FK452 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
57
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
49/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Falken FK452 — better comfort, handling and wet. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
FK452 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | FK452 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 68 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
FK452 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | FK452 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
FK452 leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | FK452 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 33 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Bluearth E51 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | FK452 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
FK452 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | FK452 | Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 45 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK452 | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 57 |
| Dry | 82 | 68 |
| Wet | 72 | 50 |
| Comfort | 73 | 33 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 80 |
| Handling | 73 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
57
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken FK452 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive dry and wet grip, often rivaling premium brands at a significantly lower price point. While many users praise its predictable handling and value, a notable segment of owners reports issues with road noise, rapid tread wear, and soft sidewalls that can impact steering precision.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry and wet traction for spirited driving
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics
- Attractive, aggressive tread pattern design
Cons
- High levels of road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'bearing-like' sound
- Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feel or 'gelatinous' handling
- Lack of adequate rim protection
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles frequently reported faster rear tire wear and occasional traction loss under heavy acceleration.
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., Audi A8, BMW 7 Series) noted that the soft sidewalls could lead to increased tramlining and less precise turn-in compared to stiffer premium alternatives.
- Some users observed that the tire width can run slightly narrower than other brands of the same nominal size, occasionally causing fitment or aesthetic concerns.
The Yokohama BluEarth E51 receives a mixed to negative reception from users, primarily due to its performance as an OEM-fitted tire on luxury vehicles like the Lexus NX300h. While some owners appreciate its longevity and tread wear, many report significant issues with cabin noise, ride harshness, and inconsistent wet-weather traction.
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Lack of refinement for luxury vehicle applications
Observations
- Lexus NX300h owners frequently report that the tire's stiff sidewalls and high noise levels detract from the vehicle's intended luxury experience.
- Users noted that the tire's performance limitations become apparent during rapid direction changes, highlighting its unsuitability for spirited driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK452 | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Falken
57
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Falken FK452 — better comfort, handling and wet. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken FK452 scores 73 vs 33 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken FK452 scores 73 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken FK452 scores 72 vs 50 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken FK452 scores 82 vs 68 on dry.
Tire A · Falken FK452
Tire B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken FK452 also compared with
Yokohama Bluearth E51 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.