Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Turanza T005 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
88/100
36 professional tests
User signal (40%)
72/100
181 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
81
Comfort
69
Noise
81
Treadwear
66
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Bluearth E51

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Bluearth E51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
49/100
4 owner reviews
Dry
68
Wet
50
Comfort
33
Noise
–
Treadwear
80
Handling
45

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
84
B — Yokohama Bluearth E51
68
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Bluearth E51
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 –
Tire Rack owners 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 68

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 31
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
81
B — Yokohama Bluearth E51
50
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Bluearth E51
Professional tests (TWG score) 83 –
Tire Rack owners 82 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 50

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 36
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
69
B — Yokohama Bluearth E51
33
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Bluearth E51
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 33

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
81
B — Yokohama Bluearth E51
–
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Bluearth E51
Professional tests (TWG score) 81 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Bluearth E51 leads by 14
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
66
B — Yokohama Bluearth E51
80
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Bluearth E51
Tire Rack owners 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza T005 leads by 27
A — Bridgestone Turanza T005
72
B — Yokohama Bluearth E51
45
Why this score
SourceTuranza T005Bluearth E51
Tyre Reviews owners 72 45
DriverReviews owners 84 –

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza T005Yokohama Bluearth E51
Relative Score 74 57
Dry 84 68
Wet 81 50
Comfort 69 33
Noise 81 –
Treadwear 66 80
Handling 72 45

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Turanza T005

The Bridgestone Turanza T005 is a polarizing touring tire that excels in wet-weather safety and fuel efficiency but faces significant criticism regarding its longevity and ride comfort. While many users praise its wet-road confidence and predictable handling, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature tread wear, sidewall cracking, and high road noise, leading to a highly divided consensus.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Predictable and safe handling for daily commuting
  • Strong dry-road braking performance

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
  • High levels of road noise and cabin resonance
  • Reports of sidewall cracking and premature aging
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and lack of precision

Observations

  • Users with high-torque EVs and performance-oriented vehicles frequently report excessive wheel spin and rapid wear due to the tire's compound.
  • Drivers of premium sedans (BMW, Audi) often note a significant improvement in comfort when switching from run-flat tires to the T005, though some find the ride still too firm.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those driving on poor-quality road surfaces report that the soft sidewalls are vulnerable to impact damage and bubbling.
Tire B Yokohama Bluearth E51

The Yokohama BluEarth E51 receives a mixed to negative reception from users, primarily due to its performance as an OEM-fitted tire on luxury vehicles like the Lexus NX300h. While some owners appreciate its longevity and tread wear, many report significant issues with cabin noise, ride harshness, and inconsistent wet-weather traction.

Pros

  • Impressive tread longevity and durability
  • Stable handling in dry conditions
  • Adequate performance for standard commuting

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
  • Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
  • Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
  • Lack of refinement for luxury vehicle applications

Observations

  • Lexus NX300h owners frequently report that the tire's stiff sidewalls and high noise levels detract from the vehicle's intended luxury experience.
  • Users noted that the tire's performance limitations become apparent during rapid direction changes, highlighting its unsuitability for spirited driving.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Mixed

Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided. While some drivers praise its wet-weather performance, highway stability, and value compared to competitors like Michelin, others report issues with excessive road noise, stiff comfort levels, rapid wear, and poor grip in certain conditions.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Road noise and comfort#Treadwear and durability#Run-flat performance#Price and value

Based on 23 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Bluearth E51

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available24—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Yokohama

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005 — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama Bluearth E51 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 69 vs 33 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 81 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 72 vs 45 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 84 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005
Tire B · Yokohama Bluearth E51

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.