69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Falken FK453CC — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich A/T KO2 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Falken FK453CC if handling and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
A/T KO2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | FK453CC |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
FK453CC leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | FK453CC |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 67 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
A/T KO2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | FK453CC |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 57 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
A/T KO2 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | FK453CC |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 63 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
FK453CC leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | FK453CC |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Falken FK453CC |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 66 |
| Dry | 84 | 77 |
| Wet | 64 | 67 |
| Snow | 92 | – |
| Comfort | 61 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 63 |
| Handling | 50 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Falken FK453CC is generally perceived as a budget-friendly tire that offers a noticeable improvement in dry handling over certain OEM alternatives. However, user experience is polarized regarding ride comfort and tread longevity, with reports suggesting the tire can feel harsh on uneven surfaces and may negatively impact fuel efficiency.
Pros
- Improved dry handling performance compared to factory-fitted tires
- Strong value proposition for the price point
- Capable performance during long-distance motorway driving
Cons
- Harsh ride quality on uneven or potholed urban roads
- Negative impact on fuel economy
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Extended break-in period required to achieve optimal ride comfort
Observations
- Users noted a significant difference in ride quality depending on the specific OEM tire being replaced, suggesting the FK453CC's performance is highly relative to the previous tire's characteristics.
- The tire requires a break-in period of approximately 1,000 miles before the initial stiffness subsides.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Falken FK453CC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
BFGoodrich
66
/ 100
Falken
Winner: BFGoodrich A/T KO2 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Falken FK453CC if handling and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 80 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken FK453CC scores 67 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 84 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 scores 61 vs 57 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Falken FK453CC
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 also compared with
Falken FK453CC also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.