51
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
50/100
27 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken ZE512 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
107 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD08RS leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | ZE512 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD08RS leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | ZE512 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 47 | 65 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD08RS leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | ZE512 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 68 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD08RS leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | ZE512 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 45 | 81 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Neova AD08RS leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | ZE512 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 72 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZE512 | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 75 |
| Dry | 67 | 86 |
| Wet | 47 | 69 |
| Comfort | 55 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 45 | 78 |
| Handling | 50 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
51
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken ZE512 is a polarizing budget-oriented tire that receives mixed reviews, often criticized for its rapid tread wear and inconsistent wet-weather performance. While some users appreciate its initial dry grip and affordability, many report significant dissatisfaction regarding its longevity and lack of structural durability on rough road surfaces.
Pros
- Affordable price point
- Satisfactory dry pavement grip when new
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good initial handling characteristics for casual driving
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes and curbs
- Significant performance degradation as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users driving performance-oriented or heavier vehicles frequently reported premature wear and lack of stability.
- Drivers noted that the soft sidewall construction provides a comfortable ride but lacks the structural integrity required for rough urban road conditions.
The Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS is a polarizing tire that serves as a durable, long-lasting street-oriented performance tire rather than a dedicated track semi-slick. While many users criticize it for failing to match the legendary dry grip and track-day performance of its predecessor, the AD08R, it is widely praised by those who prioritize longevity, consistent handling, and daily drivability over ultimate lap times.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to traditional 200TW track tires.
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics for spirited street driving.
- Surprisingly capable in wet conditions for a tire with this tread pattern.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures without overheating.
Cons
- Significant reduction in dry grip and 'bite' compared to the previous AD08R model.
- Frequent reports of audible squealing when approaching the limit, which can be misleading to drivers.
- Harder compound requires more aggressive driving or specific pressure management to reach optimal operating temperature.
- Not suitable for competitive track use where maximum mechanical grip is required.
Observations
- Users with lightweight, mid-engine platforms (e.g., Lotus Elise, MR2) report better satisfaction with the tire's balance and predictability.
- High-horsepower RWD vehicles often struggle with traction, with some users noting the tire is insufficient for cars exceeding 400hp.
- Drivers of FWD hatchbacks appreciate the tire's longevity for dual-purpose road and occasional track use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE512 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
51
/ 100
Falken
75
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 78 vs 45 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 69 vs 47 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 72 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 75 vs 55 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken ZE512
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken ZE512 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.