Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 90 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 65 |
| SimpleTire owners | 79 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 47 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 2 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 68 |
| SimpleTire owners | 84 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 34 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 83 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 79 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 72 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 75 |
| Dry | 89 | 86 |
| Wet | 75 | 69 |
| Snow | 36 | – |
| Comfort | 34 | 75 |
| Noise | 52 | – |
| Treadwear | 78 | 78 |
| Handling | 81 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 is widely regarded as a high-value, street-oriented summer performance tire that excels in dry grip and steering responsiveness. While it is a favorite among owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 and Toyota MR2, users note that its softer sidewall construction prioritizes ride comfort over the razor-sharp precision required for dedicated track use.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather traction and predictable handling near the limit.
- Strong value proposition, offering performance comparable to premium tires at a lower price point.
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire.
- Good availability in niche, smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) that are often neglected by other manufacturers.
- Reliable wet weather performance for daily driving conditions.
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering.
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing rapid wear under spirited driving or improper alignment.
- Not suitable for track-day abuse, as the compound can overheat and lose grip during extended high-intensity sessions.
- Some reports of increased road noise on specific asphalt surfaces or after the tire has aged.
- Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being 'out of round' or difficult to balance.
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars (Miata, MR2, Honda CRX) frequently praise the tire for balancing daily comfort with enough grip for spirited back-road driving.
- Users with heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally report that the tire's sidewall flex is noticeable, leading to a less 'planted' feel compared to stiffer UHP alternatives.
- Drivers running 15-inch and 16-inch sizes appreciate the tire as one of the few remaining high-performance options for their vehicles.
The Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS is a polarizing tire that serves as a durable, long-lasting street-oriented performance tire rather than a dedicated track semi-slick. While many users criticize it for failing to match the legendary dry grip and track-day performance of its predecessor, the AD08R, it is widely praised by those who prioritize longevity, consistent handling, and daily drivability over ultimate lap times.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to traditional 200TW track tires.
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics for spirited street driving.
- Surprisingly capable in wet conditions for a tire with this tread pattern.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures without overheating.
Cons
- Significant reduction in dry grip and 'bite' compared to the previous AD08R model.
- Frequent reports of audible squealing when approaching the limit, which can be misleading to drivers.
- Harder compound requires more aggressive driving or specific pressure management to reach optimal operating temperature.
- Not suitable for competitive track use where maximum mechanical grip is required.
Observations
- Users with lightweight, mid-engine platforms (e.g., Lotus Elise, MR2) report better satisfaction with the tire's balance and predictability.
- High-horsepower RWD vehicles often struggle with traction, with some users noting the tire is insufficient for cars exceeding 400hp.
- Drivers of FWD hatchbacks appreciate the tire's longevity for dual-purpose road and occasional track use.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Based on 20 community posts
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 37 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS — better comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if handling, wet and dry matter most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08RS scores 75 vs 34 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 81 vs 72 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 75 vs 69 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 89 vs 86 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.