Tests 90 · 20 tests Owners 85 · 276 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (straight aqua)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta Sport PS72 leads, 83–81 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 8 tests Owners 94 · 542 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (subj. wet handling)
“Kumho ecsta sport S. Huge improvement Just finished off the stock Michelin Pilot sport 4 street tires. They were so darn loud. I had my track tires on and they were significantly quieter than the PS4 tires. So I decided to switch to the Kumho Ecsta Sport S (PS72) in a 225/40/18 Immediately noticed a slightly more compliant ride (taller sidewall is the cause?) and much quieter even on crosshatch concrete. They’re relatively cheap at $160 per tire. Treadwear is much lower at 240 so I’ll see how long they last.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
86
Dry
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +185Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) 85 82 Reviews found online 86 91 Dry Braking (% of best) 94% 95% Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 99% -
85
Wet
Ecsta Sport PS72 +287Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) 88 86 Reviews found online 82 88 Wet Braking (% of best) 94% 84% Wet Circle (% of best) 98% 98% Wet Handling (% of best) 96% 98% -
79
Comfort
Level79Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) 79 82 Reviews found online 79 75 -
77
Noise
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +869Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) 77 69 -
77
Treadwear
Ecsta Sport PS72 +885Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Reviews found online 77 85 -
80
Handling
Ecsta Sport PS72 +787Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Reviews found online 80 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 83 |
| Dry | 86 | 85 |
| Wet | 85 | 87 |
| Comfort | 79 | 79 |
| Noise | 77 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 85 |
| Handling | 80 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
83
/ 100
Ecsta Sport PS72
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ecsta Sport PS72 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 86% #6/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 86% #9/9 · 2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test | −0.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #8/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 95% #3/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | −0.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #6/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 99% #5/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | −0.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 79% #6/9 · 2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test | +7.5 | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Grass | 93% #4/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 69% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +24.1 | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Gravel | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 99% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | −0.6 | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Gravel | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 94% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | −12.6 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 46% #23/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 70% #11/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | −23.9 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #13/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 95% #18/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | +2.8 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 72% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 89% #7/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | −16.1 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 57% #14/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 76% #13/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | −18.5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 25% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | −8.3 | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Sand | 92% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 93% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | −1.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 70% #10/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 80% #7/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | −10.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 78% #10/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 88% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | −9.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 80% #7/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | −20.0 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 0% #6/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% #7/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 84% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | +10.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #4/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 98% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | +0.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #8/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/9 · 2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test | −1.5 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B Ecsta Sport PS72
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip with short braking distances
- High value for money compared to Tier-1 premium brands
- Stable, predictable handling and confident cornering
Cons
- Reported instances of out-of-round tires causing high-speed steering vibrations
- Occasional complaints about increased road noise on certain rough surfaces
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users during aggressive, spirited driving
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 (and its 'Sport S' variant) is overwhelmingly positive, with many users praising its exceptional value, low noise levels, and impressive dry and wet grip that rivals premium tier brands like Michelin. While a few note potential drawbacks such as a lack of rim protection or varied longevity expectations, the general consensus is that these tires punch significantly above their weight class for the price.
r/TyreReviews
·73 upvotes ·2026-04-04
“New summer tires A while ago, I made a post during my search for a new set of summer tires. In the end, I chose the Kumho PS72 Ecsta Sport S. My previous tires included the Michelin PS4S, Bridgestone Turanza T005, Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3, and Toyo Proxes Sport 2. With the Michelins being my favorite in terms of driving feel. By now, I’ve driven around 1,000 km on the Kumhos, and I’m pleasantly surprised. They offer excellent grip on dry roads and in corners, and they still perform well in wet conditions. My car has over 300 hp and AWD, so grip is definitely important. I can highly recommend these tires, especially considering the price. In terms of feel and performance, they don’t seem to fall short of the Michelin PS4S I had before, yet they cost me about half as much.”
r/TyreReviews
·57 upvotes ·2025-06-21
“Thoroughly delighted with the new Kumho Ecsta Sport S (PS72) 500 miles ago I swapped out my “winter” (Pirelli WeatherActives) set for these Kumhos and I have been extremely satisfied with performance, cornering, and especially ride comfort and quietness. Mind you, this is the Ecsta Sport S, which is above the Ecsta Sport A/S and Sport in terms of sportiness. The price was also a delight, at just a hair above US$1,000 including labor. Car is a 2013 Audi Q5 with the supercharged 3.0 V6 running 20x9 Porsche Macan wheels. Read more”
r/TyreReviews
·38 upvotes ·2026-05-31
“Kumho Sport PS72 (225/40/18) Absolutely in love with these tyres so far! I’ve currently only done about 150 miles in the warm UK weather, the dry grip is unbelievable & it feels so responsive. I moved from Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6’s to these, so you’d probably consider it a ‘downgrade’ however from what I’ve felt so far it feels great, we’re getting heavy rain over the next 5/6 days so I’ll be able to test the wet grip & braking so I’ll report back for that. One massive downside… the severe lack of Rim protection (as seen in the photos) if you regularly parking near kerbs or you’re a woman this is not ideal.”
Top themes
#Dry and wet grip#Price and value#Ride comfort and noise#Comparison to Michelin#Handling and steering feel#Treadwear and longevity
Based on 29 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 37 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.4/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
83
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Winner: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 77 vs 69 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 85 vs 77 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 87 vs 80 on handling.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews found online. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.