75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
36 professional tests
User signal (40%)
72/100
181 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
86/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
113 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T005 if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 86 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 95% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 82 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 94% | 94% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 67% | 61% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 93% | 86% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | 65 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 79 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Turanza T005 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 74 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 79 |
| Dry | 84 | 86 |
| Wet | 81 | 83 |
| Comfort | 69 | 71 |
| Noise | 81 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 77 |
| Handling | 72 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 94% #3/6 · 2024 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 93% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.6 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #2/7 · 2019 NAF Summer Tyre Test | 95% #11/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #4/7 · 2019 NAF Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | +2.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 90% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 100% #11/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | -9.9 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 95% #5/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 100% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -5.1 | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Grass | 84% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 93% #4/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | -9.8 | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Gravel | 97% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Gravel | 94% #4/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | +12.3 | Same test |
| Mud Traction | Mud | 100% #2/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 91% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | +8.7 | Same test |
| Abrasion | Other | 58% #16/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 60% #23/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -1.9 | Same test |
| Noise | Other | 97% #5/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | 97% #4/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | -0.3 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 79% #4/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | 80% #4/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | -1.4 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 91% #15/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 76% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | +15.7 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 62% #11/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 57% #14/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | +5.2 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/10 · 2020 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 17% #6/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | +3.3 | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Sand | 94% #4/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 92% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | +1.7 | Same test |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 88% #6/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -10.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #1/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 93% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | +7.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 60% #14/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 94% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | -34.4 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 80% #6/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 80% #7/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% #10/53 · 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test | 94% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | -0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 67% #20/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 61% #4/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +5.7 | Same test |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 93% #4/6 · 2024 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 86% #3/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +7.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #3/6 · 2024 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 98% #8/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +1 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 is a polarizing touring tire that excels in wet-weather safety and fuel efficiency but faces significant criticism regarding its longevity and ride comfort. While many users praise its wet-road confidence and predictable handling, a substantial portion of the user base reports premature tread wear, sidewall cracking, and high road noise, leading to a highly divided consensus.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Predictable and safe handling for daily commuting
- Strong dry-road braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
- High levels of road noise and cabin resonance
- Reports of sidewall cracking and premature aging
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and lack of precision
Observations
- Users with high-torque EVs and performance-oriented vehicles frequently report excessive wheel spin and rapid wear due to the tire's compound.
- Drivers of premium sedans (BMW, Audi) often note a significant improvement in comfort when switching from run-flat tires to the T005, though some find the ride still too firm.
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those driving on poor-quality road surfaces report that the soft sidewalls are vulnerable to impact damage and bubbling.
The Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry grip, often outperforming more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its quietness and comfort, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding high rolling resistance and inconsistent experiences with road noise and ride firmness.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors.
- Generally low road noise and high levels of ride comfort.
- Strong, durable sidewalls that provide positive handling feedback.
Cons
- Increased fuel consumption reported by many users due to high rolling resistance.
- Inconsistent reports on noise levels, with some users finding them louder than expected.
- Ride quality can feel overly firm or 'harsh' on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Some reports of premature wear or rapid tread depth reduction in specific driving conditions.
Observations
- Drivers of lightweight, sporty hatchbacks (e.g., Mini Cooper, Renault Twingo RS) report significant handling improvements and a more 'planted' feel compared to OEM run-flat or budget tires.
- Users with firm or sport-tuned suspensions occasionally find the tire's sidewall stiffness makes the ride feel too harsh on imperfect road surfaces.
- Performance on heavy or high-torque vehicles can lead to faster tread wear if driven aggressively.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Community opinions on the Bridgestone Turanza T005 are divided. While some drivers praise its wet-weather performance, highway stability, and value compared to competitors like Michelin, others report issues with excessive road noise, stiff comfort levels, rapid wear, and poor grip in certain conditions.
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2025-06-06
“Lateral dry rot - Bridgestone Turanza T005 DOT 21, 3rd summer on service - all 4 tires have these cracks on their laterals, should I be worried?”
r/BMWI4
·4 upvotes ·2025-08-18
“The Bridgestone Turanza T005 UHP Summer tires suck My BMW i4 e40 has 8k miles on it. I usually never get flats, but in the past 8 months I have almost been stranded 3 times by flats, and I have had to replace two of tires because they were completely worn. These Bridgestone Turanza T005 UHP Summer tires are terrible. I've been replacing the worn tires with run-flats, but probably time to move to a different brand and all-season tire.”
r/TyreReviews
·4 upvotes ·2025-02-13
“I drove my friend’s Leon Cupra fitted with these Turanza T005 18” last summer to Croatia. Rountrip plus some local driving, all in all 2k km, the tyres were totally okay driving on highways and local roads. Not noisy. Good tyres for sure.”
r/CarTalkUK
·3 upvotes ·2022-12-15
“Bridgestone Turanza T005 tyres... Are they really shit or is there something wrong with my car? I've just had brand new ones fitted, I don't expect them to be amazing in this weather but I'm slipping and sliding all over the place. My car has less grip than my old tyres with 2mm left. Seriously, I went round a roundabout last night at 20mph and drifted out from the inner lane. Could there be something I need to get checked because I don't feel quite safe with them on... Read more”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Road noise and comfort#Treadwear and durability#Run-flat performance#Price and value
Based on 23 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 | B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
79
/ 100
Falken
Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T005 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 77 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Turanza T005 scores 81 vs 74 on noise.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza T005 also compared with
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.