74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 vs Firestone All Season — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
55
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
41/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza RE720 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE720 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 99 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE720 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 98 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 58 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE720 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | All Season |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE720 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE720 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE720 | All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE720 | Firestone All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 55 |
| Dry | 84 | 59 |
| Wet | 77 | 51 |
| Snow | – | 52 |
| Comfort | 70 | 49 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 58 |
| Handling | 77 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
55
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE720 is a polarizing performance tire characterized by its exceptional dry grip, stiff sidewalls, and precise handling. While enthusiasts praise its track-ready responsiveness and cornering stability, many users report significant drawbacks regarding rapid tread wear, high price points, and a lack of ride comfort.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- High steering responsiveness due to stiff sidewalls
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- Strong performance in competitive or spirited driving scenarios
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- High price-to-value ratio compared to competitors
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users
Observations
- Users noted that the stiff sidewalls provide excellent feedback on smaller, agile vehicles like the Fiat Tipo, though at the expense of ride comfort.
- Competitive road rally usage resulted in extremely fast wear, with front tires lasting approximately 5,000 miles under heavy load.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720 | B · Firestone All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 62 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Bridgestone
55
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE720 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 scores 77 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 scores 84 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 scores 70 vs 49 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 scores 77 vs 59 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720
Tire B · Firestone All Season
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 also compared with
Firestone All Season also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.