Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Falken ZE912 vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ZE912 | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 75 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ZE912 | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 50 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | ZE912 | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 45 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ZE912 | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 75 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ZE912 | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 75 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ZE912 | Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZE912 | Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 88 |
| Dry | 82 | 94 |
| Wet | 74 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 79 |
| Comfort | 79 | 94 |
| Noise | – | 90 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 92 |
| Handling | 70 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken ZE912 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range tire that excels in comfort and noise reduction, making it a popular choice for daily commuters. While many users praise its dry grip and predictable handling, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is polarized, with experiences varying significantly based on driving style and vehicle weight.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling
- Good all-season versatility in mild conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
- Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
- Lack of rim protection
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving aggressively often report significantly faster tread wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW 3-series, Subaru Impreza) frequently noted that the soft sidewalls reduced steering feedback and cornering confidence compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Owners of vehicles with 'odd' tire sizes (e.g., Nissan Note) found these to be a cost-effective solution when premium options were limited.
The Firestone FireHawk AS is generally regarded as a high-value, sporty all-season tire that offers impressive dry grip and handling characteristics. While many users praise its longevity and aesthetic appeal, there is a notable divide regarding its wet-weather performance, with some users reporting significant concerns regarding hydroplaning.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong dry traction and cornering stability
- Attractive aesthetic design
- High value-to-price ratio
- Responsive steering feedback and sidewall stiffness
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding hydroplaning in heavy rain
- Potential for tread cracking after extended high-mileage use
- Availability issues at local retail outlets
Observations
- Owners of RWD performance vehicles like the Ford Mustang and Infiniti G35 report high satisfaction with cornering and handling.
- The tire demonstrates robust durability on high-torque FWD vehicles, effectively resisting belt shifting compared to other brands.
- Drivers of heavy, body-on-frame sedans appreciate the increased sidewall stiffness for improved steering feedback.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE912 | B · Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 92 vs 71 on treadwear.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 94 vs 79 on comfort.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 87 vs 74 on wet.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 94 vs 82 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.