Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Firestone FR740 vs Michelin Energy E3B — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Firestone FR740 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
24/100
Owner ratings
Dry
74
Wet
60
Snow
38
Comfort
50
Noise
47
Treadwear
51
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Energy E3B

Summer Premium Touring tires

Michelin Energy E3B tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
97
Snow
–
Comfort
80
Noise
–
Treadwear
78
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy E3B — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Energy E3B leads by 13
A — Firestone FR740
74
B — Michelin Energy E3B
87
Why this score
SourceFR740Energy E3B
Tire Rack owners 73 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Energy E3B leads by 37
A — Firestone FR740
60
B — Michelin Energy E3B
97
Why this score
SourceFR740Energy E3B
Tire Rack owners 59 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 97

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone FR740
38
B — Michelin Energy E3B
–
Why this score
SourceFR740Energy E3B
Tire Rack owners 37 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Energy E3B leads by 30
A — Firestone FR740
50
B — Michelin Energy E3B
80
Why this score
SourceFR740Energy E3B
Tire Rack owners 52 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone FR740
47
B — Michelin Energy E3B
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Energy E3B leads by 27
A — Firestone FR740
51
B — Michelin Energy E3B
78
Why this score
SourceFR740Energy E3B
Tire Rack owners 52 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 78

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Energy E3B leads by 16
A — Firestone FR740
72
B — Michelin Energy E3B
88
Why this score
SourceFR740Energy E3B
Tyre Reviews owners – 88

Scores at a glance

Firestone FR740 vs Michelin Energy E3B: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone FR740Michelin Energy E3B
Relative Score 60 86
Dry 74 87
Wet 60 97
Snow 38 –
Comfort 50 80
Noise 47 –
Treadwear 51 78
Handling 72 88

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone FR740

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Michelin Energy E3B

The Michelin Energy E3B is highly regarded by users for its exceptional wet-weather performance and reliable grip. While it commands a premium price point, owners consistently report that the safety benefits and confidence-inspiring handling in rain justify the investment.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet road traction and water evacuation
  • High resistance to aquaplaning
  • Low noise levels
  • Reliable and confidence-inspiring handling

Cons

  • Higher price point compared to competitors
  • Dry road performance, while adequate, is occasionally described as slightly less impressive than expected

Observations

  • Users report successful fitment and performance improvements on older compact vehicles like the VW Golf II.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles note that the tire provides a significant upgrade in stability and driver confidence compared to budget-tier alternatives.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone FR740 B · Michelin Energy E3B
Category—Summer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

Michelin

Winner: Michelin Energy E3B — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Energy E3B scores 97 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Energy E3B scores 80 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy E3B scores 78 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Energy E3B scores 88 vs 72 on handling.

Tire A · Firestone FR740
Tire B · Michelin Energy E3B

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.