81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
27 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone Winterforce 2 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Firestone Winterforce 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 48 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 78 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winterforce 2 | iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Winterforce 2 | Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | – |
| Dry | 83 | – |
| Wet | 89 | – |
| Snow | 96 | – |
| Comfort | 81 | – |
| Noise | 78 | – |
| Treadwear | 82 | – |
| Handling | 50 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
–
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 6% #17/17 · 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | 7% #14/17 · 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | -1.3 | Same test |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone WinterForce 2 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly winter tire that excels in deep snow and challenging winter conditions. While it earns high praise for its aggressive traction and affordability, users note compromises in dry-road handling, road noise, and ice performance compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and capability in deep snow
- Highly competitive price point
- Reliable performance for daily winter commuting
- Effective water displacement in wet conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise compared to all-season tires
- Noticeable 'mushy' or soft handling feedback on dry pavement
- Limited performance on ice without studs
- Faster tread wear when used year-round
Observations
- Users with RWD vehicles report significant improvements in winter drivability, though some note a lack of dry-handling precision.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda Miata, Ford Focus) report high satisfaction with snow-clearing capabilities.
- Some users report a harsh ride quality on older SUVs, suggesting the tire's construction may be less forgiving on certain chassis types.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Winterforce 2 | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 31 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Firestone
–
/ 100
Yokohama
Only Firestone Winterforce 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Firestone Winterforce 2
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Winterforce 2 also compared with
Yokohama iceGUARD iG52c also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.