72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
60/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
87/100
56 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
General Altimax Arctic 12 vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Winter i*cept evo — better dry, snow and wet. Pick the General Altimax Arctic 12 if handling, comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 17 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 43 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 100 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic 12 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic 12 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic 12 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 72 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Altimax Arctic 12 | Hankook Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 81 |
| Dry | 45 | 80 |
| Wet | 61 | 79 |
| Snow | 74 | 100 |
| Comfort | 86 | 79 |
| Noise | 83 | – |
| Treadwear | 86 | 80 |
| Handling | 80 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Altimax Arctic 12 is widely regarded as a high-value, top-tier winter tire that excels in deep snow, slush, and icy conditions. While users note some expected trade-offs in dry pavement handling and increased road noise, the consensus highlights its exceptional longevity and performance-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow, slush, and ice
- Exceptional tread life and durability for a winter-specific tire
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands like Nokian or Bridgestone
- Reliable performance across a diverse range of vehicles, from small sedans to heavy trucks
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Softer sidewalls leading to 'squishy' or less precise handling on dry pavement
- Slightly higher rolling resistance resulting in a minor decrease in fuel economy
- Reduced grip on dry and wet pavement compared to dedicated all-season or summer tires
Observations
- Drivers of RWD vehicles, such as the BMW Z4, reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain control in harsh winter conditions.
- Users with light-weight vehicles (e.g., Chevy HHR) and heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Ram, F-150) both report consistent, reliable traction in deep snow.
- The XL-rated versions provide a robust, beefy sidewall that some users appreciate for sport-tuned suspensions.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo is a polarizing winter tire that receives high praise for its exceptional snow and ice traction, particularly on heavier or AWD vehicles. However, user experiences regarding wet-weather grip and high-speed stability are inconsistent, with some drivers reporting significant issues with wheelspin and braking confidence in damp or wet conditions.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and on icy inclines
- Excellent value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Strong resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
- Good tread wear longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip leading to reports of wheelspin and ABS activation
- Lack of high-speed stability and precision on certain vehicle chassis
- Increased noise levels and reduced comfort compared to summer tires
- Performance degradation in warmer temperatures (squirmy handling)
Observations
- AWD and heavier vehicles (e.g., VW Touareg, Land Rover Discovery) report superior snow performance, often outperforming expectations.
- Users with high-torque FWD or RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW 1-series, tuned hatchbacks) frequently report issues with wheelspin and lack of wet-weather traction.
- Downsizing wheel diameter (e.g., moving from 17-inch to 16-inch) was noted to significantly improve snow and ice performance on some vehicles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Altimax Arctic 12 | B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Ultra High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
General
81
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept evo — better dry, snow and wet. Pick the General Altimax Arctic 12 if handling, comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 80 vs 45 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 100 vs 74 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Winter i*cept evo scores 79 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Altimax Arctic 12 scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Tire A · General Altimax Arctic 12
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Altimax Arctic 12 also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept evo also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.