85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
General Altimax Arctic vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
16 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
117 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Altimax Arctic — better snow, noise and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 86 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | 81 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 86 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Altimax Arctic | Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 81 |
| Dry | 87 | 88 |
| Wet | 86 | 85 |
| Snow | 88 | 75 |
| Comfort | 86 | 81 |
| Noise | 83 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 86 |
| Handling | 78 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General AltiMAX Arctic is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that delivers exceptional traction in snow, slush, and ice. While some users note a slight increase in road noise and a softer feel in dry conditions, the consensus is that it offers performance comparable to premium brands at a significantly more accessible price point.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and icy conditions
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium winter tire brands
- Impressive tread longevity for a dedicated winter compound
- Reliable handling and braking performance in cold-weather environments
Cons
- Increased road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewall feel leading to less precise handling on dry pavement
- Potential for minor understeer during aggressive cornering
- Not intended for year-round use, as dry performance is compromised
Observations
- Owners of RWD vehicles, including sports roadsters, report high confidence in deep snow and winter conditions.
- Users with light-weight vehicles (e.g., Chevy HHR, FWD Civics) report excellent starting and stopping capability on slippery surfaces.
- Drivers of heavy-duty trucks and SUVs appreciate the durability and load-handling capabilities of the tire's construction.
The Michelin CrossClimate+ is widely regarded as a benchmark all-season tire, praised for its exceptional versatility and ability to bridge the gap between summer handling and winter safety. While most users report high levels of confidence in wet, dry, and snowy conditions, a minority of users note a decline in performance as the tread wears down or express dissatisfaction with noise levels and ride harshness on specific vehicle setups.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
- Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for the majority of users.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures.
Cons
- Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
- Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Some users report a 'spongy' or less precise steering feel during aggressive cornering.
Observations
- Users with heavier diesel vehicles or high-torque setups occasionally report faster tread wear and increased road noise.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) often report improved steering responsiveness and comfort compared to OEM tires.
- Performance on SUVs and 4x4s is frequently cited as a major upgrade over standard summer tires, particularly for winter mountain driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Altimax Arctic | B · Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
General
81
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: General Altimax Arctic — better snow, noise and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
General Altimax Arctic scores 88 vs 75 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
General Altimax Arctic scores 83 vs 76 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Altimax Arctic scores 86 vs 81 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Altimax Arctic scores 78 vs 73 on handling.
Tire A · General Altimax Arctic
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Altimax Arctic also compared with
Michelin CrossClimate+ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.