Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs General Grabber Arctic LT — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

Winter Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
66/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
20 owner reviews
Dry
68
Wet
67
Snow
76
Comfort
84
Noise
77
Treadwear
79
Handling
65
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B General

General Grabber Arctic LT

General Grabber Arctic LT tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
Owner ratings
Dry
90
Wet
91
Snow
89
Comfort
85
Noise
79
Treadwear
95
Handling
88
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: General Grabber Arctic LT — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic LT leads by 22
A
68
B
90
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Grabber Arctic LT
Professional tests (TWG score) 58 –
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 70 –
SimpleTire owners 88 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic LT leads by 24
A
67
B
91
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Grabber Arctic LT
Professional tests (TWG score) 55 –
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –
SimpleTire owners 86 97

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic LT leads by 13
A
76
B
89
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Grabber Arctic LT
Professional tests (TWG score) 65 –
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –
SimpleTire owners 91 94

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic LT leads by 1
A
84
B
85
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Grabber Arctic LT
Professional tests (TWG score) 86 –
Tire Rack owners 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 64 –
SimpleTire owners 87 94

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic LT leads by 2
A
77
B
79
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Grabber Arctic LT
SimpleTire owners 77 86

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic LT leads by 16
A
79
B
95
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Grabber Arctic LT
Tire Rack owners 84 –
Tyre Reviews owners 73 –
SimpleTire owners 82 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Grabber Arctic LT leads by 23
A
65
B
88
Why this score
SourceBlizzak WS90Grabber Arctic LT
Tyre Reviews owners 65 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryBridgestone Blizzak WS90General Grabber Arctic LT
Relative Score 74 89
Dry 68 90
Wet 67 91
Snow 76 89
Comfort 84 85
Noise 77 79
Treadwear 79 95
Handling 65 88

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance on ice, deep snow, and slush. While users occasionally note increased road noise or less precise handling on dry pavement compared to all-season alternatives, the consensus remains that it is a premier choice for severe winter climates.

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
  • Strong capability in slush and deep snow
  • High level of driver confidence in extreme weather

Cons

  • Increased road noise during highway driving
  • Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
  • Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
  • Perceived as less refined in dry conditions compared to the previous WS80 generation

Observations

  • Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles without modern traction control reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain mobility.
  • Drivers of front-wheel-drive sedans noted significant improvements in winter handling and the ability to avoid using four-wheel-drive modes in moderate conditions.
Tire B General Grabber Arctic LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 B · General Grabber Arctic LT
CategoryWinter Premium Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available456
Rim diameters15″ – 19″16″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″16/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi80 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

General

Winner: General Grabber Arctic LT — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 91 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 88 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 90 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 95 vs 79 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber Arctic LT
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.