–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Radial T/A Spec vs General Grabber AT 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
257 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly General Grabber AT 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Radial T/A Spec | Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Radial T/A Spec | Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 49 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Radial T/A Spec | Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Radial T/A Spec | Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Radial T/A Spec | Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Radial T/A Spec | Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 66 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Radial T/A Spec | General Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 89 |
| Dry | – | 95 |
| Wet | – | 90 |
| Snow | – | 85 |
| Comfort | – | 88 |
| Noise | – | 86 |
| Treadwear | – | 89 |
| Handling | – | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The General Grabber A/T2 (and its successor, the ATX) is widely regarded as a high-value, rugged all-terrain tire that excels in snow, ice, and off-road conditions. While most users praise its aggressive aesthetic, durability, and superior winter performance compared to more expensive competitors, some report issues with road noise, fuel economy, and a tendency for the tread to retain small rocks.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in deep snow, ice, and mud
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands like BFG
- Rugged, aggressive aesthetic with effective rim protection
- Strong durability and long tread life for many users
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride on pavement for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Tread pattern prone to picking up and throwing small rocks
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG)
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear or tires going out of shape
- Increased road noise, particularly as the tire ages
- Some users report poor wet-weather grip on specific road surfaces
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (2500/3500 series) report good stability while towing, though proper inflation pressure is critical to avoid a 'floating' or swaying sensation.
- Users on smaller SUVs or crossovers occasionally report faster tread wear and higher noise levels compared to truck applications.
- Load Range E variants are highly recommended for those frequently towing heavy trailers to maintain structural integrity.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Radial T/A Spec | B · General Grabber AT 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
BFGoodrich
89
/ 100
General
Only General Grabber AT 2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Radial T/A Spec
Tire B · General Grabber AT 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Radial T/A Spec also compared with
General Grabber AT 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.