Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 30 reviews
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 vs Michelin Energy X2+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy X2+ is ahead, 75–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Energy X2+ +875Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Reviews found online 66 78 -
68
Wet
Energy X2+ +1179Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Reviews found online 67 82 -
65
Comfort
Energy X2+ +772Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Reviews found online 61 76 -
66
Treadwear
Energy X2+ +672Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Reviews found online 65 77 -
65
Handling
Energy X2+ +1277Why this score
Source Assurance Triplemax 2 Energy X2+ Reviews found online 65 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 75 |
| Dry | 67 | 75 |
| Wet | 68 | 79 |
| Comfort | 65 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 72 |
| Handling | 65 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Assurance Triplemax 2
Energy X2+
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance Triplemax 2
Pros
- Superb dry and wet grip when new
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and handling during heavy rain
- Good value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Becomes significantly noisier as the tread wears down
- Stiff sidewalls leading to a harsh or crashy ride over rough surfaces
- Decline in wet grip and performance as the tire ages or wears past 50%
Tire B Energy X2+
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | B · Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
Michelin Energy X2+
Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 77 vs 65 on handling.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 79 vs 68 on wet.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 75 vs 67 on dry.
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.