Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Falken ZIEX CT50 vs Goodyear DuraGrip — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken ZIEX CT50

Summer Premium Touring tires

Falken ZIEX CT50 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
62
Snow
37
Comfort
58
Treadwear
63
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Goodyear

Goodyear DuraGrip

Summer Touring tires

Goodyear DuraGrip tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
18 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
72
Snow
–
Comfort
75
Treadwear
75
Handling
69

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Goodyear DuraGrip — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DuraGrip leads by 2
A — Falken ZIEX CT50
79
B — Goodyear DuraGrip
81
Why this score
SourceZIEX CT50DuraGrip
Tyre Reviews owners 77 81

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) DuraGrip leads by 10
A — Falken ZIEX CT50
62
B — Goodyear DuraGrip
72
Why this score
SourceZIEX CT50DuraGrip
Tyre Reviews owners 60 72

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken ZIEX CT50
37
B — Goodyear DuraGrip
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DuraGrip leads by 17
A — Falken ZIEX CT50
58
B — Goodyear DuraGrip
75
Why this score
SourceZIEX CT50DuraGrip
Tyre Reviews owners 53 75

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) DuraGrip leads by 12
A — Falken ZIEX CT50
63
B — Goodyear DuraGrip
75
Why this score
SourceZIEX CT50DuraGrip
Tyre Reviews owners 65 75

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZIEX CT50 leads by 1
A — Falken ZIEX CT50
70
B — Goodyear DuraGrip
69
Why this score
SourceZIEX CT50DuraGrip
Tyre Reviews owners 70 69

Scores at a glance

Falken ZIEX CT50 vs Goodyear DuraGrip: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZIEX CT50Goodyear DuraGrip
Relative Score 66 74
Dry 79 81
Wet 62 72
Snow 37 –
Comfort 58 75
Treadwear 63 75
Handling 70 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken ZIEX CT50

The Falken ZIEX CT50 receives mixed to negative feedback, primarily criticized for its excessive road noise and acoustic performance. While users acknowledge acceptable handling characteristics and reasonable tread longevity, the persistent noise issues significantly detract from the overall ownership experience.

Pros

  • Acceptable tread wear longevity
  • Competent handling performance
  • Reliable dry road stability

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and 'wooing' sounds on tarmac
  • Low treadwear rating (300) compared to aftermarket alternatives
  • Susceptibility to manufacturing defects such as slow leaks

Observations

  • Mazda CX-9 owners consistently report that the tire compromises the vehicle's intended quiet cabin experience.
  • Users note that the tire's performance and noise levels do not improve with consistent rotation or pressure adjustments.
Tire B Goodyear DuraGrip

The Goodyear DuraGrip is generally regarded as a reliable, budget-friendly tire that performs well on light vehicles, particularly in its first two years of service. While users frequently praise its dry grip and surprising capability in light snow, the consensus highlights a significant drop-off in wet-weather performance and handling characteristics as the rubber ages or reaches the latter stages of its tread life.

Pros

  • Strong dry-weather traction and handling
  • Surprisingly effective performance in light snow conditions
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Durable sidewall construction

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet grip as the tire ages
  • Tendency for premature edge wear on certain vehicle geometries
  • Hardening of rubber compound over time leading to reduced traction
  • Inconsistent noise levels reported across different road surfaces

Observations

  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles like the Honda Jazz and Yaris report high satisfaction with the tire's longevity and fuel efficiency.
  • Users noted that the tire's tread pattern is susceptible to physical damage and tearing when driven on rough, rocky, or macadam road surfaces.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX CT50 B · Goodyear DuraGrip
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Goodyear

Winner: Goodyear DuraGrip — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear DuraGrip scores 75 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear DuraGrip scores 75 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear DuraGrip scores 72 vs 62 on wet.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX CT50
Tire B · Goodyear DuraGrip

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.