Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental PureContact LS vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental PureContact LS

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Continental PureContact LS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
79
Snow
48
Comfort
58
Noise
–
Treadwear
70
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
VerdictWinner: Continental PureContact LS — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 2
A — Continental PureContact LS
86
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
84
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners 86 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 8
A — Continental PureContact LS
79
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
71
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 80
Tyre Reviews owners 79 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental PureContact LS
48
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
–
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tyre Reviews owners 48 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 5
A — Continental PureContact LS
58
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
63
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 74
Tyre Reviews owners 58 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental PureContact LS
–
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
61

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 23
A — Continental PureContact LS
70
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
47
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 63
Tyre Reviews owners 70 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) PureContact LS leads by 1
A — Continental PureContact LS
85
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
84
Why this score
SourcePureContact LSEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –

Scores at a glance

Continental PureContact LS vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental PureContact LSGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Relative Score 75 67
Dry 86 84
Wet 79 71
Snow 48 –
Comfort 58 63
Noise – 61
Treadwear 70 47
Handling 85 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental PureContact LS

The Continental PureContact LS receives a polarized reception from users, balancing praise for its longevity and wet-weather performance against significant complaints regarding noise levels and cold-weather flat-spotting. While some drivers appreciate the tire's luxury-oriented ride and tread life, others report inconsistent quality and frustrating vibration issues that detract from the overall ownership experience.

Pros

  • Extended tread life compared to performance-oriented alternatives
  • Reliable grip and stability in wet road conditions
  • Comfortable, vibration-isolating ride quality
  • Improved handling characteristics over many original equipment tires

Cons

  • Persistent flat-spotting issues, particularly in colder temperatures
  • Excessive road noise and humming at highway speeds
  • Diminished traction and grip performance as the tread wears down
  • Inconsistent winter weather capability

Observations

  • Owners of luxury sedans like the Lexus ES 350 and Lincoln Continental reported significant issues with morning flat-spotting and vibrations.
  • Users transitioning from performance-focused tires, such as the ExtremeContact DWS 06, noted a distinct trade-off between increased tread life and a loss of sporty steering feedback.
Tire B Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
CategoryAll Season Ultra High Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG700 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Goodyear

Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental PureContact LS scores 70 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental PureContact LS scores 79 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 63 vs 58 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.