Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
VerdictToo close to call: Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat are within 2 points overall. Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat is stronger on wet, treadwear and dry. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat is stronger on handling and comfort.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat leads by 3
A — Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
87
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
84
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners 86 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat leads by 4
A — Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
75
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
71
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 80
Tyre Reviews owners 73 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 3
A — Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
60
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
63
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 74
Tyre Reviews owners 57 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
–
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
61

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat leads by 4
A — Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
51
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
47
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tire Rack owners – 63
Tyre Reviews owners 50 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat leads by 8
A — Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
76
B — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
84
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 5 SSR RunflatEagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Tyre Reviews owners 76 –

Scores at a glance

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Sport Contact 5 SSR RunflatGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Relative Score 68 67
Dry 87 84
Wet 75 71
Comfort 60 63
Noise – 61
Treadwear 51 47
Handling 76 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

The Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR is a polarizing run-flat tire that earns praise for its dry-weather handling and superior comfort compared to older run-flat generations. However, it is widely criticized for its rapid tread wear, poor durability against road hazards like potholes, and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent dry-weather grip and handling precision
  • Improved ride comfort compared to traditional run-flat tires
  • Predictable and progressive behavior when pushed
  • Strong aesthetic appeal for performance vehicles

Cons

  • Extremely rapid tread wear and short service life
  • High susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural damage from potholes
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance and aquaplaning risks
  • High replacement cost relative to longevity

Observations

  • Users with high-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW 335d, Mercedes C-Class) report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Owners of heavier SUVs (e.g., BMW X5) report surprisingly better longevity and even wear compared to sedan owners.
  • Drivers on poorly maintained urban roads frequently report rim damage and tire failure due to the stiff SSR sidewall construction.
Tire B Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
CategorySummer Max Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Goodyear

Too close to call: Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat are within 2 points overall. Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat is stronger on wet, treadwear and dry. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat is stronger on handling and comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 84 vs 76 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 75 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 51 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 87 vs 84 on dry.

Tire A · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.