Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK453 Runflat | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK453 Runflat | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK453 Runflat | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK453 Runflat | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 63 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK453 Runflat | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 67 |
| Dry | 67 | 84 |
| Wet | 63 | 71 |
| Comfort | 70 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 47 |
| Handling | 70 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat receives a mixed reception, with users divided between its value as a mid-range alternative to premium run-flats and concerns regarding its longevity. While many appreciate its dry handling capabilities and competitive pricing, the tire's performance in wet conditions and inconsistent tread life remain significant points of contention.
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
- Satisfactory road feedback for daily driving
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
- Discrepancy between advertised wet-weather ratings and real-world performance
Observations
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted Bridgestone run-flats noted a reduction in road noise.
- Spirited driving styles appear to significantly impact the longevity of the tire, leading to polarized experiences regarding tread durability.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 84 vs 67 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 84 vs 70 on handling.
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat scores 60 vs 47 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat scores 71 vs 63 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.