83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
76/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
83/100
198 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 vs Nexen N FERA RU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
75/100
25 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better noise, wet and handling. Pick the Nexen N FERA RU1 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 81 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 94 | 82 |
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 97% | 90% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 73 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 56 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 100 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 71 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 77 |
| Dry | 81 | 82 |
| Wet | 90 | 79 |
| Snow | 73 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 76 |
| Noise | 93 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 78 |
| Handling | 81 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #4/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test | 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +2.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #4/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +0.7 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 79% #1/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +5.2 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #9/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 98% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -0.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 77% #3/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test | 64% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +13.2 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 13% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +7.5 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 97% #7/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +2.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 97% #8/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #3/3 · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 VS Asymmetric 3 VS Continental PremiumContact 6 - In depth test | 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +2.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is widely regarded as a premium, comfort-oriented performance tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While it receives high praise for its quiet ride, wet-weather traction, and overall refinement, it is frequently criticized by enthusiasts for having soft sidewalls that can compromise steering precision and feedback during spirited driving.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet and dry grip performance for daily commuting
- High value-for-money compared to direct competitors like Michelin
- Excellent longevity for many users, particularly in non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and 'mushy' handling
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear on high-torque vehicles
- Reduced rim protection compared to previous generations
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage from potholes
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5/6 series) frequently report excellent mileage and comfort, especially with Run-Flat (ROF) variants.
- Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks and sports cars often find the sidewalls too soft for track use or aggressive cornering, preferring stiffer alternatives.
- The tire is noted to have a significant 'bed-in' period, with performance and handling characteristics improving noticeably after 1,000–2,500 km.
The Nexen N Fera RU1 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction, often outperforming more expensive premium brands in these categories. While many users report excellent longevity and wet/dry grip, a subset of owners experiences inconsistent performance, particularly regarding tread wear and high-speed stability on specific vehicle platforms.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Impressive tread life for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some reports of premature chipping or rapid degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback or vibrations at highway speeds
- Performance drop-off in colder temperatures or wet conditions for some users
- Lack of responsiveness during aggressive or high-speed maneuvers
Observations
- SUV owners (e.g., Volvo XC90, VW Tiguan) generally praise the comfort and longevity, though some report concerns with emergency handling.
- Users on larger rim sizes (e.g., 20-inch) have reported specific issues with sidewall flex and vibration that were not present on smaller, higher-profile sizes.
- Performance on modern EVs (e.g., Kia EV6) appears polarized, with some users finding the handling characteristics unsuitable for the vehicle's dynamics.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is generally mixed, with users comparing it to competitors like Michelin and Bridgestone regarding handling, noise, and wear. While some drivers appreciate their performance and find good deals or rebates on them, others note that competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport offer better wet grip and lower noise, or that snow performance is lacking as expected from a summer tire.
r/GolfGTI
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-17
“Most recent 3 tyres for me: Current at >40,000km - Bridgestone Potenza RE003 ~20,000km - Michelin Pilot Sport 4 ~35,000km - Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 The Pilot Sport 4 has been my favourite of the three by far - handling felt just as good as the Goodyear Eagle F1 whilst having less road noise and incredible wet grip, but they just didn't last long. But I enjoyed them so much I'll try the Pilot Sport 5's next as they supposedly have improvements to tread wear.”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“Hi there, I need to put new tyres on my f30 330d. I want to switch away from run flats. The tyres will be used all year round. I was veering towards the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 as recommended by this website (although I am open to other suggestions): ... However the snow performance seems to be lacking (not too surprising given they are a summer tyre) ... Therefore I was wondering about Michelin crossclimate instead: ... I live in a rural part of the south east so I get no more than two weeks of snow a year but face driving on un-gritted roads when it does snow. The rub here is that I'm compromising the cars performance for the rest of the year to make sure I'm OK for 2 weeks in winter! Any thoughts on which option would be best for somebody in my position? Thanks”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“Hi, I currently have Falken Azenis FK510s all round and i need to replace both front tyres. Sticking with Runflats, are these a good option: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (225/40 R19 93Y) ROF XL *BMW [F] and is there any downsides to running 2 different brands? The back don't need changing yet car is a 335d xDrive Thanks for any info”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2018-05-28
“Originally Posted By: slacktide_bitog DTD has their memorial day sale, and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is $132 each, plus $200 in rebates. If you open up a DTD credit card, there is another $100 $50 rebate available (making the total $300 $250 off) I made a slight mistake, sorry But still, $200 or $250 off the set of four tires is a great deal”
Top themes
#Wet and dry handling#Comparison with Michelin#Tread wear and lifespan#Road noise and comfort#Pricing and sales deals
Based on 11 community posts
Tire B
Nexen N FERA RU1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 | B · Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 9 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 42 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Goodyear
77
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 — better noise, wet and handling. Pick the Nexen N FERA RU1 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 93 vs 74 on noise.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 90 vs 79 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 scores 81 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 76 vs 68 on comfort.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Tire B · Nexen N FERA RU1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 also compared with
Nexen N FERA RU1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.