77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
75/100
25 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen N FERA RU1 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
85/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N FERA RU1 — better noise and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | N FERA RU1 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 95 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 93% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | N FERA RU1 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 89 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 90% | 88% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 96% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | N FERA RU1 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 45 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 72 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | N FERA RU1 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 35 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | N FERA RU1 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | N FERA RU1 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 91 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N FERA RU1 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 74 |
| Dry | 82 | 84 |
| Wet | 79 | 77 |
| Comfort | 76 | 56 |
| Noise | 74 | 35 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 86 |
| Handling | 71 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
74
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 92% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +0.8 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 77% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | -3.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 95% #1/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +2.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 14% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | -1.8 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 80% #8/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +15.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 88% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +1.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 96% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +1.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera RU1 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction, often outperforming more expensive premium brands in these categories. While many users report excellent longevity and wet/dry grip, a subset of owners experiences inconsistent performance, particularly regarding tread wear and high-speed stability on specific vehicle platforms.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Impressive tread life for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some reports of premature chipping or rapid degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback or vibrations at highway speeds
- Performance drop-off in colder temperatures or wet conditions for some users
- Lack of responsiveness during aggressive or high-speed maneuvers
Observations
- SUV owners (e.g., Volvo XC90, VW Tiguan) generally praise the comfort and longevity, though some report concerns with emergency handling.
- Users on larger rim sizes (e.g., 20-inch) have reported specific issues with sidewall flex and vibration that were not present on smaller, higher-profile sizes.
- Performance on modern EVs (e.g., Kia EV6) appears polarized, with some users finding the handling characteristics unsuitable for the vehicle's dynamics.
The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering impressive grip and stability for SUVs and crossovers. While users frequently praise its responsive steering and cornering capabilities, the consensus is divided regarding ride comfort and cabin noise, with several owners noting that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsh experience on imperfect road surfaces.
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
- Competitive price point for a premium-branded tire
- Even and durable tread wear
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Observations
- SUV and crossover owners generally report high satisfaction with handling and cornering stability.
- Users driving larger, heavier vehicles like the Alphard Hybrid noted that the tire's stiffness is more pronounced on uneven road surfaces, impacting perceived comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N FERA RU1 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Nexen
74
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Nexen N FERA RU1 — better noise and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 if handling and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 74 vs 35 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 76 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 91 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 86 vs 78 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N FERA RU1
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N FERA RU1 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.