Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 95 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 89 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 45 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 72 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 35 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 86 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth Es ES32 | BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 91 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 79 |
| Dry | 83 | 84 |
| Wet | 78 | 77 |
| Comfort | 86 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 35 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 86 |
| Handling | 81 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering impressive grip and stability for SUVs and crossovers. While users frequently praise its responsive steering and cornering capabilities, the consensus is divided regarding ride comfort and cabin noise, with several owners noting that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsh experience on imperfect road surfaces.
Pros
- Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Responsive and sharp steering handling
- High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
- Competitive price point for a premium-branded tire
- Even and durable tread wear
Cons
- Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
- Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
- Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality
Observations
- SUV and crossover owners generally report high satisfaction with handling and cornering stability.
- Users driving larger, heavier vehicles like the Alphard Hybrid noted that the tire's stiffness is more pronounced on uneven road surfaces, impacting perceived comfort.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama
Yokohama
Too close to call: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 and Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on comfort. Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 56 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 86 vs 75 on treadwear.
Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 91 vs 81 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.