Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Dry
83
Wet
78
Comfort
86
Noise
–
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
85/100
11 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
77
Comfort
56
Noise
35
Treadwear
86
Handling
91

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 and Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on comfort. Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 1
A — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
83
B — Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
84
Why this score
SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
Professional tests (TWG score) – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 83 95

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 1
A — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
78
B — Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
77
Why this score
SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
Professional tests (TWG score) – 69
Tyre Reviews owners 78 89

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 30
A — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
86
B — Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
56
Why this score
SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
Professional tests (TWG score) – 45
Tyre Reviews owners 86 72

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
–
B — Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
35
Why this score
SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
Professional tests (TWG score) – 35

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 11
A — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
75
B — Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
86
Why this score
SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
Tyre Reviews owners 75 86

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth XT AE61 leads by 10
A — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
81
B — Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
91
Why this score
SourceBluEarth Es ES32BluEarth XT AE61
Tyre Reviews owners 81 91

Scores at a glance

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama BluEarth Es ES32Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
Relative Score 80 79
Dry 83 84
Wet 78 77
Comfort 86 56
Noise – 35
Treadwear 75 86
Handling 81 91

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
  • Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
  • Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving

Observations

  • Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
  • Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
  • Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Tire B Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

The Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering impressive grip and stability for SUVs and crossovers. While users frequently praise its responsive steering and cornering capabilities, the consensus is divided regarding ride comfort and cabin noise, with several owners noting that the stiff sidewalls can lead to a harsh experience on imperfect road surfaces.

Pros

  • Excellent grip and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Responsive and sharp steering handling
  • High stability during cornering due to rigid sidewall construction
  • Competitive price point for a premium-branded tire
  • Even and durable tread wear

Cons

  • Noticeable cabin noise, particularly on aged or rough road surfaces
  • Stiff sidewall construction results in a harsh ride on bumpy or unpaved roads
  • Comfort levels are highly dependent on road surface quality

Observations

  • SUV and crossover owners generally report high satisfaction with handling and cornering stability.
  • Users driving larger, heavier vehicles like the Alphard Hybrid noted that the tire's stiffness is more pronounced on uneven road surfaces, impacting perceived comfort.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Too close to call: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 and Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on comfort. Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 is stronger on treadwear and handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 86 vs 75 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61 scores 91 vs 81 on handling.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth XT AE61

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.