Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ProContact RX vs Goodyear Eagle Touring — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Goodyear Eagle Touring tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
43 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
84
Snow
77
Comfort
85
Noise
84
Treadwear
75
Handling
53

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental ProContact RX and Goodyear Eagle Touring are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle Touring is stronger on snow.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ProContact RX leads by 2
A — Continental ProContact RX
91
B — Goodyear Eagle Touring
89
Why this score
SourceProContact RXEagle Touring
Tire Rack owners 91 82
Tyre Reviews owners – 65
SimpleTire owners – 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ProContact RX leads by 1
A — Continental ProContact RX
85
B — Goodyear Eagle Touring
84
Why this score
SourceProContact RXEagle Touring
Tire Rack owners 85 71
Tyre Reviews owners – 48
SimpleTire owners – 89

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle Touring leads by 11
A — Continental ProContact RX
66
B — Goodyear Eagle Touring
77
Why this score
SourceProContact RXEagle Touring
Tire Rack owners 66 54
Tyre Reviews owners – 45
SimpleTire owners – 82

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ProContact RX
85
B — Goodyear Eagle Touring
85
Why this score
SourceProContact RXEagle Touring
Tire Rack owners 85 77
Tyre Reviews owners – 75
SimpleTire owners – 87

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ProContact RX
–
B — Goodyear Eagle Touring
84
Why this score
SourceProContact RXEagle Touring
SimpleTire owners – 84

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ProContact RX
75
B — Goodyear Eagle Touring
75
Why this score
SourceProContact RXEagle Touring
Tire Rack owners 75 60
Tyre Reviews owners – 58
SimpleTire owners – 78

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ProContact RX
–
B — Goodyear Eagle Touring
53
Why this score
SourceProContact RXEagle Touring
Tyre Reviews owners – 53

Scores at a glance

Continental ProContact RX vs Goodyear Eagle Touring: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ProContact RXGoodyear Eagle Touring
Relative Score 80 81
Dry 91 89
Wet 85 84
Snow 66 77
Comfort 85 85
Noise – 84
Treadwear 75 75
Handling – 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ProContact RX

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Goodyear Eagle Touring

The Goodyear Eagle Touring receives highly polarized feedback, often functioning as a polarizing OEM-fitted tire that satisfies some drivers with its comfort and price point while frustrating others with premature wear and inconsistent performance. While many users praise its quiet ride and value, a significant portion of the user base reports poor longevity and lackluster traction in adverse weather conditions.

Pros

  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Competitive price point and value
  • Reliable performance in dry, fair-weather conditions
  • Satisfactory comfort for highway and long-distance driving

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Poor traction and handling in wet or snowy conditions
  • Difficulty maintaining balance
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage and road noise

Observations

  • Users with larger SUVs and crossovers, such as the Jeep Wagoneer and Mazda CX-50, frequently report inadequate wet-weather performance and limited all-season capability.
  • Tesla and other high-torque vehicle owners report mixed results, with some achieving decent mileage while others note that the tires require frequent rotation to avoid rapid degradation.
  • Owners of sedans like the Honda Accord report inconsistent experiences, ranging from 'smooth and quiet' to 'loud and poor construction' depending on individual expectations and driving habits.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ProContact RX B · Goodyear Eagle Touring
Sizes available129
Rim diameters19″18″ – 24″
Tread depth9/32″8 - 12/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A - B350 - 560 A A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Goodyear

Too close to call: Continental ProContact RX and Goodyear Eagle Touring are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle Touring is stronger on snow.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Goodyear Eagle Touring scores 77 vs 66 on snow.

Tire A · Continental ProContact RX
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle Touring

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.