82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Goodyear Eagle Vector vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle Vector — better treadwear. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Eagle Vector | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle Vector leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Eagle Vector | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Eagle Vector | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle Vector leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Eagle Vector | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle Vector leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Eagle Vector | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle Vector | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 80 |
| Dry | 76 | 83 |
| Wet | 80 | 78 |
| Comfort | 83 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 75 |
| Handling | 83 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle Vector is highly regarded as a reliable, long-lasting all-season tire that excels in providing consistent performance across varied weather conditions. Users frequently praise its versatility, noting it serves as an excellent compromise for drivers who prefer to avoid the seasonal hassle of swapping between dedicated summer and winter tires.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Reliable traction in light to moderate snow
- Excellent value as a year-round, multi-seasonal solution
Cons
- Performance in heavy snow is limited compared to dedicated winter tires
- Tread wear can be uneven when comparing front and rear axle longevity
- Handling characteristics may feel less sharp than dedicated summer performance tires
Observations
- Users driving diesel-powered estate and sedan vehicles (Mercedes, Audi) report high satisfaction with the tire's ability to handle the torque and weight of these platforms.
- Front-wheel-drive configurations show significantly faster tread wear on the front axle compared to the rear, suggesting a need for regular rotation to maximize lifespan.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle Vector | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Goodyear
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Goodyear Eagle Vector — better treadwear. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle Vector scores 85 vs 75 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 83 on comfort.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle Vector
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle Vector also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.