83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
89/100
12 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
87/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
74/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance and Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X are within 2 points overall. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance is stronger on comfort, handling and snow. Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X is stronger on noise.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
UltraGrip Performance leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | UltraGrip Performance | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 83 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | UltraGrip Performance | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 85 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 90% | 97% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
UltraGrip Performance leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | UltraGrip Performance | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 90 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 100% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 98% | 96% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 95% | 93% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
UltraGrip Performance leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | UltraGrip Performance | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 53 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo 3 X leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | UltraGrip Performance | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 62 | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
UltraGrip Performance leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | UltraGrip Performance | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
UltraGrip Performance leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | UltraGrip Performance | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance | Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 84 |
| Dry | 87 | 86 |
| Wet | 86 | 86 |
| Snow | 89 | 86 |
| Comfort | 86 | 75 |
| Noise | 62 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 80 |
| Handling | 88 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 94% #4/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 89% #4/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +4.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 96% #8/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +4.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #9/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 99% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 81% #6/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 90% #5/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -8.2 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #12/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | 100% #11/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -0.4 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 90% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 73% #4/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +17.6 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 11% #9/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +88.9 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% #3/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 95% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +4.1 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% #5/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 96% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +1.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 95% #6/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 93% #4/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +1.6 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 91% #8/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 94% #7/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -2.9 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 98% #2/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 95% #4/9 · 2023 Tyre Reviews SUV Winter Tyre Test | +3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 97% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -7.8 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 99% #6/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance is highly regarded by users for its exceptional traction in snow and wet conditions, often described as offering near-summer tire performance on dry pavement. While the majority of users praise its longevity and consistent winter capability, some note a slight increase in noise and fuel consumption during warmer temperatures.
Pros
- Exceptional snow and ice traction
- Strong performance in wet and dry conditions
- High tread longevity and durability
- Well-mannered handling in varied winter weather
Cons
- Increased road noise in warmer conditions
- Slightly higher fuel consumption
- Limited performance on pure ice surfaces
- High initial price point
Observations
- Users report consistent, reliable performance across diverse vehicle types, including compact cars like the Renault Megane and performance-oriented vehicles like the Mercedes SLK.
- The tire demonstrates significant longevity, with some users reporting up to five seasons of use before requiring replacement.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X is widely regarded as a highly capable winter performer, particularly in deep and heavy snow conditions where it offers excellent traction and braking. While it provides strong value compared to premium competitors, user experiences are polarized regarding its comfort levels and noise output, with some drivers finding the ride quality significantly lacking.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and control in deep, fresh, and heavy wet snow
- Strong braking performance in cold, winter conditions
- Competitive pricing compared to other premium winter tire brands
- Effective performance in low-temperature wet conditions
Cons
- High levels of road noise reported by some users
- Noticeable lack of ride comfort and perceived stiffness
- Soft handling characteristics when temperatures rise above 13°C
- Inconsistent user satisfaction regarding long-term comfort
Observations
- Owners of SUVs, such as the Volvo XC60, have reported that the tire's stiff construction can lead to an uncomfortable ride experience.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance | B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Ultra High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Goodyear
84
/ 100
Hankook
Too close to call: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance and Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X are within 2 points overall. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance is stronger on comfort, handling and snow. Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X is stronger on noise.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X scores 100 vs 62 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 86 vs 75 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 88 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 89 vs 86 on snow.
Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.