84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Dynapro AT M vs Sumitomo H/TR Z — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
68/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Dynapro AT M — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 73 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 68 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 50 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT M | Sumitomo H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 67 |
| Dry | 87 | 83 |
| Wet | 78 | 73 |
| Snow | 72 | – |
| Comfort | 84 | 68 |
| Noise | 82 | – |
| Treadwear | 86 | 50 |
| Handling | 86 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Sumitomo H/TR Z receives highly polarized feedback, with users divided between those praising its value and longevity and those reporting significant durability and safety concerns. While some drivers report excellent tread life and performance comparable to premium brands, others cite premature wear and catastrophic structural failure.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong dry weather traction
- Competitive tread life for some users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear and longevity
- Subpar wet weather performance
- Reports of structural failure and blowouts
Observations
- Users operating on challenging terrain, such as steep country roads, reported significantly accelerated tread wear compared to standard commuting.
- Drivers maintaining specific tire pressure protocols, such as nitrogen filling and slightly elevated PSI, reported better-than-average longevity on mid-sized vehicles like the Volvo V50.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT M | B · Sumitomo H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Hankook
67
/ 100
Sumitomo
Winner: Hankook Dynapro AT M — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 86 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 84 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 86 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 78 vs 73 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT M
Tire B · Sumitomo H/TR Z
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Dynapro AT M also compared with
Sumitomo H/TR Z also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.