83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
76/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
81/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
General Grabber GT vs Sumitomo H/TR Z — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
68/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: General Grabber GT — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Grabber GT leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Grabber GT | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Grabber GT leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Grabber GT | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Grabber GT leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Grabber GT | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 68 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Grabber GT | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Grabber GT leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Grabber GT | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 50 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Grabber GT leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Grabber GT | H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 70 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber GT | Sumitomo H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 67 |
| Dry | 84 | 83 |
| Wet | 84 | 73 |
| Comfort | 81 | 68 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 88 | 50 |
| Handling | 75 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Grabber GT is widely regarded as a high-value, durable tire that excels in longevity and provides reliable performance across various road conditions. While most users praise its exceptional tread life and versatility for light off-road or towing tasks, some report concerns regarding wet-weather grip as the tire ages and occasional susceptibility to sidewall punctures.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage performance
- Strong value-for-money proposition
- Reliable traction for towing and light off-road use
- Solid handling and steering feedback in dry conditions
Cons
- Potential decline in wet-weather grip as the tread wears down
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to sharp debris
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Occasional uneven wear patterns
Observations
- Users frequently highlight the tire's effectiveness for towing heavy loads, such as caravans, across soft or boggy terrain.
- The tire is noted as a popular, cost-effective alternative to premium OEM tires on SUVs and 4x4 vehicles.
The Sumitomo H/TR Z receives highly polarized feedback, with users divided between those praising its value and longevity and those reporting significant durability and safety concerns. While some drivers report excellent tread life and performance comparable to premium brands, others cite premature wear and catastrophic structural failure.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong dry weather traction
- Competitive tread life for some users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear and longevity
- Subpar wet weather performance
- Reports of structural failure and blowouts
Observations
- Users operating on challenging terrain, such as steep country roads, reported significantly accelerated tread wear compared to standard commuting.
- Drivers maintaining specific tire pressure protocols, such as nitrogen filling and slightly elevated PSI, reported better-than-average longevity on mid-sized vehicles like the Volvo V50.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber GT | B · Sumitomo H/TR Z |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
General
67
/ 100
Sumitomo
Winner: General Grabber GT — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber GT scores 88 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber GT scores 81 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber GT scores 84 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber GT scores 75 vs 70 on handling.
Tire A · General Grabber GT
Tire B · Sumitomo H/TR Z
More comparisons
Also compared with
General Grabber GT also compared with
Sumitomo H/TR Z also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.