Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

G Fit EQ+ is ahead, 72–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AHankook

Dynapro AT2

All Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 212 reviews

“The stock Dynapro AT2 tires are awful in the rain We've had our first real rain since spring today here in the PNW, and I've gotta say these stock Hankook tires are the worst tires I've ever driven in the rain. Every single time I turned around a corner, it's a one tire fire on the inside rear. I've driven in the rain here my whole life, in cars with far more power than these Frontiers, and I've never once had the TC light kick on unintentionally when it's raining out. I'm not even flooring it, I baby the hell out of this truck! I looked it up online and looks like I'm not the only one who's noticed this. I can't imagine the performance in the snow is any good if it can hardly handle some rain. As much as I hate to waste a set of new tires, I just can not wait to upgrade to something better. Noodling around the neighborhood at 20mph spinning up the rears is not something I'd like to keep doing. Read more”

Tire BLaufenn

G Fit EQ+

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    G Fit EQ+ +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online5974
  2. 61

    Wet

    G Fit EQ+ +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online5975
  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online57–
  4. 62

    Comfort

    G Fit EQ+ +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online5463
  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online57–
  6. 60

    Treadwear

    G Fit EQ+ +11
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online5774
  7. 54

    Handling

    G Fit EQ+ +20
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro AT2G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online5474
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro AT2Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Relative Score 60 72
Dry 63 72
Wet 61 74
Snow 62 –
Comfort 62 66
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 60 71
Handling 54 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dynapro AT2

G Fit EQ+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro AT2

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride on asphalt and highway conditions
  • Good traction and stability in dry and wet weather
  • Reliable performance when towing trailers and hauling heavy loads

Cons

  • Poor grip and scary handling in winter conditions, including snow, ice, and slush
  • Developed significant road noise or a drumming sound over time as they wore
  • Concerns regarding durability, including premature casing punctures on gravel and sidewall cracking
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 review

Tire B G Fit EQ+

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions
  • Reliable handling on dry surfaces
  • Strong value for money

Cons

  • Slightly elevated road noise reported during operation
All owner themes in the G Fit EQ+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community opinion on the Hankook Dynapro AT2 (including the Xtreme variant) is generally favorable regarding highway ride quality, low noise levels, and dry handling. However, owners draw a sharp distinction between OEM versions—which frequently receive criticism for poor wet traction and winter performance—and the aftermarket or Xtreme versions, which are often praised for better durability, value, and snow handling.

r/RangerNext ·13 upvotes ·2026-09-27

“Swapped out my tires 2026 ranger fx4 So last week I installed some Sailun Terramax RT tires that ride like absolute dog shit ! I learned my lesson. And will never order cheaper tires again , I decided to go with Hankook dynapro at2 extreme this time around and I love them , yes much less agressive but a better looking tire than the Goodyear territory at that came stock with the truck !”

r/nissanfrontier ·3 upvotes ·2024-10-29

“The OEM Hankook AT2 tires on an F150 are really just an overweight LT tire going through a midlife crisis. There are LT tires that likely perform better in all categories combined while being half a dozen or more pounds lighter. They are the epitome of mediocrity, the AT should stand for A ll T ypes of pavement. Soft ride, decent mileage for AT badging don't make up for sloppy wet braking, mid tier handling an allergy to mud traction and lame tread life. I'm down to 6/32 after 50,000km (31,000 miles) of less than spirited driving, they start at 14/32. The tread wear alone makes these tires damn near twice as costly as KO2s to run. They were passable in winter, better than the KO2s which turn into skates when the thermometer drops Solid 5.5/10”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2024-12-30

“I replaced my BFGoodrich MT T/A tires on my Wrangler with Hankook AT2 Extreme's, and what a difference. I will say I was consistently getting 50k+ miles out of my MT T/A, doing a 5 tire rotation. I'm 8,000 miles in on the AT2's, and there is zero sign of wear. I do have a bit of wobble in my steering wheel now due to the tires needing a balance and rotation, but other than that, I have been very impressed. My wife's mind was blown that our jeep was so much quieter, and we could have a conversation at highway speed without having to yell over the tire noise. These things are practically silent. The off-road performance is greatly improved. Where the MT's would lose traction on mountain trails, the AT2's keep their grip and keep me moving.”

Top themes
#Road noise and comfort#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter performance#OEM vs aftermarket differences#Treadwear and longevity#Off-road and gravel capability#Price and value

Based on 38 community posts

Tire B

Laufenn G Fit EQ+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Laufenn G Fit EQ+

Winner: Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 74 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 74 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 71 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 72 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Leads

G Fit EQ+

Amazon