Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 84 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 59 |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 76 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 86 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 28 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 79 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT2 | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 76 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 82 |
| Dry | 80 | 88 |
| Wet | 74 | 82 |
| Snow | 58 | 69 |
| Comfort | 71 | 95 |
| Noise | – | 47 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 83 |
| Handling | 66 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Dynapro A/T2 is generally perceived as a capable highway-oriented all-terrain tire that excels in comfort, fuel efficiency, and dry-road handling. However, user consensus is divided regarding its true off-road durability and winter performance, with some owners reporting significant road noise and premature tread wear depending on the specific tire specification.
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and low noise levels for many users
- Strong fuel economy and efficiency
- Reliable traction on dry pavement and gravel surfaces
- Good towing stability for light-duty applications
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow and icy conditions
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and casing punctures
- Increased road noise (drumming) as the tread wears
- Limited off-road grip compared to dedicated all-terrain competitors
Observations
- Users noted significant differences between 'Standard' Dynapro retail versions and 'Ford OE' specific versions, with the latter often featuring shallower tread depths and shorter lifespans.
- Drivers of full-size trucks like the F-150 report mixed experiences, with some praising the towing stability while others find the tire inadequate for winter highway driving.
The Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is widely regarded as a highly capable, road-oriented all-terrain tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with moderate off-road utility. While most users praise its longevity, wet-weather performance, and snow traction, a segment of owners reports inconsistent tread life and occasional traction issues in specific conditions like deep mud or ice.
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and relatively low noise levels for an all-terrain tire
- Strong performance in light-to-moderate off-road conditions, including gravel and dirt
- Impressive tread longevity for many users, with several reports exceeding 40,000 miles
- Reliable wet-weather handling and 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) winter certification
- Aesthetic appeal with an aggressive tread pattern
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier trucks
- Performance limitations in deep mud and heavy, rutted terrain
- Occasional reports of 'floaty' steering or lack of stability on certain vehicle platforms
- Mixed feedback regarding wet-weather traction, with some users noting slippage under acceleration
Observations
- Users of heavy-duty trucks (3/4 ton and 1-ton) report varying experiences, with some praising the load-carrying stability while others note faster tread wear under heavy towing.
- Subaru owners and light SUV drivers frequently highlight the tire's ability to maintain a quiet, car-like ride compared to more aggressive mud-terrain alternatives.
- Drivers switching from passenger-rated tires to LT (Light Truck) load-range E versions noted a significant increase in ride harshness and steering stiffness.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community opinion on the Hankook Dynapro AT2 (and AT2 Xtreme) is divided between OEM versions and aftermarket/Xtreme variants. Many users praise the aftermarket Xtreme version for its low highway noise, long tread life warranty, and comfortable ride quality, while others find stock OEM versions lacking in wet weather traction and heavy off-road performance.
“The stock Dynapro AT2 tires are awful in the rain We've had our first real rain since spring today here in the PNW, and I've gotta say these stock Hankook tires are the worst tires I've ever driven in the rain. Every single time I turned around a corner, it's a one tire fire on the inside rear. I've driven in the rain here my whole life, in cars with far more power than these Frontiers, and I've never once had the TC light kick on unintentionally when it's raining out. I'm not even flooring it, I baby the hell out of this truck! I looked it up online and looks like I'm not the only one who's noticed this. I can't imagine the performance in the snow is any good if it can hardly handle some rain. As much as I hate to waste a set of new tires, I just can not wait to upgrade to something better. Noodling around the neighborhood at 20mph spinning up the rears is not something I'd like to keep doing. Read more”
“The OEM Hankook AT2 tires on an F150 are really just an overweight LT tire going through a midlife crisis. There are LT tires that likely perform better in all categories combined while being half a dozen or more pounds lighter. They are the epitome of mediocrity, the AT should stand for A ll T ypes of pavement. Soft ride, decent mileage for AT badging don't make up for sloppy wet braking, mid tier handling an allergy to mud traction and lame tread life. I'm down to 6/32 after 50,000km (31,000 miles) of less than spirited driving, they start at 14/32. The tread wear alone makes these tires damn near twice as costly as KO2s to run. They were passable in winter, better than the KO2s which turn into skates when the thermometer drops Solid 5.5/10”
“I replaced my BFGoodrich MT T/A tires on my Wrangler with Hankook AT2 Extreme's, and what a difference. I will say I was consistently getting 50k+ miles out of my MT T/A, doing a 5 tire rotation. I'm 8,000 miles in on the AT2's, and there is zero sign of wear. I do have a bit of wobble in my steering wheel now due to the tires needing a balance and rotation, but other than that, I have been very impressed. My wife's mind was blown that our jeep was so much quieter, and we could have a conversation at highway speed without having to yell over the tire noise. These things are practically silent. The off-road performance is greatly improved. Where the MT's would lose traction on mountain trails, the AT2's keep their grip and keep me moving.”
“I've loved mine on a 2024 Subaru Outback Wilderness. I came from Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S which I loved but that found one too many nails. No issues after 30,000 miles on the Hankooks. I had some Dynapro MT's back on a FJ Cruiser which I loved so that's why I decided to try them again. Just in case someone with an Outback or someone looking at these sizes, here's some data I had compiled. 235/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.1”, Section Width 9.6”, Tread Width 7.5” , Weight 32 lbs 245/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.6”, Section Width 10”, Tread Width 7.9” , Weight 35 lbs”
Based on 36 community posts
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community members generally praise the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 as a comfortable, quiet, and capable all-terrain tire that excels for daily highway commuting while handling light off-road and winter conditions well. It is frequently recommended for drivers prioritizing on-road manners, fuel efficiency, and mild trail or snow capability over heavy rock crawling.
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
“GEOLANDAR A/T G015 Anyone running these on 17" rims, stock or other? I have Enkei M52 rims, 17x7.5 and 45mm offset. What size fits without rubbing? 215/60R17 looks to be the closest, the only other size close is 225/65R17 which I think will be too big without a lift. I am open to other suggestions for off-road capable tires that will mainly be used on-road. K02 is out because they don't fit without rubbing, and I plan to add flaps at some point and do not want to lift the vehicle or get different rims.”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“Anyone here running Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 G018's? Any complaints or regrets (road noise, balancing issues, etc.), specifically in SL load? Currently have the Geolandar A/T G015's on my 4th gen and am considering the A/T4's next. All the real feedback (non-commercial reviews) I've been able find on here and other forums seem to be pretty old and mostly by people without a ton of miles on them. My use case is about 90% on road with the remaining 10% on mild to moderate trails. Not a rock crawler and never will be. The G015's in SL load have been pretty perfect but I've been thinking about changing to the A/T4's next for slightly better off road performance. Main concern (aside from weight, which is why I'm looking to stay with SL instead of C) is wet pavement safety since I drive my young kids pretty much daily. I only have a roof rack, so not too much added weight.”
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | — | 41 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 600 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better comfort, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 95 vs 71 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 83 vs 60 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 69 vs 58 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 76 vs 66 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.